2014
DOI: 10.1080/21681163.2014.889579
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A method for constructing teeth and maxillary bone parametric model from clinical CT scans

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A three-dimensional mandible model was used in this study and obtained following the reconstruction steps described in a Vasco et al study [21] (Figure 3a). The required geometric changes were performed in SolidWorks 2013 (Dassault Systemes, Solidworks Corps, Waltham, MA, USA).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A three-dimensional mandible model was used in this study and obtained following the reconstruction steps described in a Vasco et al study [21] (Figure 3a). The required geometric changes were performed in SolidWorks 2013 (Dassault Systemes, Solidworks Corps, Waltham, MA, USA).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rehabilitation of the atrophic maxilla with the all-onfour concept has been established in the literature. 2,8,9 The use of trans-sinus implants has also previously been reported by other authors; however, other authors have used conventional implants up to 15-mm long. 6,7,12,13 The particularity of the present technique lies in the use of extra-long trans-sinus implants up to 24 mm, described in 2017.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…6,7,12,13 The particularity of the present technique lies in the use of extra-long trans-sinus implants up to 24 mm, described in 2017. 8 However, biomechanical analyses of these rehabilitations are still inadequate in the literature, a factor that prompted the present study. Given the results, very close stresses on the peri-implant tissues were observed in the two models, with a discrete rise in values in the model with trans-sinus implants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was noted that the screws closest to the zone of separation between body and ramus underwent higher stress accumulation, which can be explained by the greater tendency of these segments to separate in that region; thus, stress concentration is higher closer to the osteotomy site. Since stress is calculated by dividing the force by the area considered, 21 it follows that the larger the area of distribution, the lower the stress peak in this area. The screws farthest from the zone of separation between body and ramus underwent the lowest stresses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%