2022
DOI: 10.1109/tmi.2021.3139455
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Method for Electrical Property Tomography Based on a Three-Dimensional Integral Representation of the Electric Field

Abstract: Magnetic resonance electrical properties tomography (MREPT) noninvasively reconstructs highresolution electrical property (EP) maps using MRI scanners and is useful for diagnosing cancerous tissues. However, conventional MREPT methods have limitations: sensitivity to noise in the numerical Laplacian operation, difficulty in reconstructing three-dimensional (3D) EPs and no guarantee of convergence in the iterative process. We propose a novel, iterative 3D reconstruction MREPT method without a numerical Laplacia… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, in TP reconstructions, the measured temperature and the introduced heat flux respectively correspond to the magnetic and electric fields in MREPT. Based on this analogy, we extended our previously reported technique for MREPT (Eda et al 2021) in this study to TP reconstructions. However, there are two differences between TP and EP reconstructions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, in TP reconstructions, the measured temperature and the introduced heat flux respectively correspond to the magnetic and electric fields in MREPT. Based on this analogy, we extended our previously reported technique for MREPT (Eda et al 2021) in this study to TP reconstructions. However, there are two differences between TP and EP reconstructions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…In order to derive the integral representations of the relative heat flux δJ(r, t), we first decompose δJ(r, t) by Helmholtz decomposition (Kustepeli 2016, Freeden andGerhards 2019) in Ω given by δJ(r, t) = δJ sol (r, t) + δJ irr (r, t), where δJ sol and δJ irr are the solenoidal and irrotational components of δJ, respectively. It is shown in (Eda et al 2021) that δJ irr (r, t) can be expressed by the following two different integral representations:…”
Section: Reconstruction Of Blood Perfusion Rate Based On Helmholtz De...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nevertheless, since Bz information is required to solve the full Helmholtz equation, it may still be difficult to apply the method in practice for phase‐based EPT reconstruction algorithms. Thus, for applications, it would be worthwhile to investigate the methods of composing the physics‐driven loss by (1) utilizing modified equations with their underlying assumptions (e.g., piece‐wise assumption or neglecting Bz component), (2) partially combining the network with the physics equation included in estimating Bz (Eda et al, 2022; Guo et al, 2017), or (3) applying iterative integral based EPs estimation methods (Balidemaj et al, 2015b; Giannakopoulos et al, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of EPT has been proposed to compute the electrical permittivity and conductivity based on the Helmholtz equation. The manipulation of the Helmholtz equation leads to a representation of the conductivity and permittivity in relation to the Laplacian of the magnetic field |B1| 11 , 12 . This method requires a condition in which the gradient of the sum of permittivity and conductivity is zero.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%