1999
DOI: 10.1016/s1350-4533(98)00082-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A method for quantifying time dependent changes in MR signal intensity of articular cartilage as a function of tissue deformation in intact joints

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…w͑, x, p j ͒ [4] where N A and N B are the number of vertices of the surfaces A and B, respectively. By varying , the effect of the weighting function can be controlled.…”
Section: Force Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…w͑, x, p j ͒ [4] where N A and N B are the number of vertices of the surfaces A and B, respectively. By varying , the effect of the weighting function can be controlled.…”
Section: Force Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Equation [4] describes the interpolation and smoothing of the distance vectors that are applied iteratively during the registration. In each iteration k, the smoothing effect characterized by the constant is diminished: k ϭ 0 / 2 k .…”
Section: Force Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Recent advances in MRI technology have led to significant improvements in spatial resolution and contrast, enabling researchers to evaluate anatomic damage of all these joint structures in the axial, coronal, and sagittal planes (14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24). Recently, we and other investigators have developed a system for quantifying cartilage volume using MRI acquisitions combined with sophisticated software (25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34)(35)(36)(37)(38)(39)(40)(41); however, to date, few studies have used MRI technology to evaluate cartilage volume changes over time (42)(43)(44)(45)(46). Some clinical parameters, such as age, weight, body mass index (BMI), trauma, and baseline radiologic JSW, have already been identified as predictors of rapid radiologic progression of knee OA (47,48).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%