A method for rapid quantitative assessment of biofilms with biomolecular staining and image analysis

Abstract

The accumulation of bacteria in surface-attached biofilms can be detrimental to human health, dental hygiene, and many industrial processes. Natural biofilms are soft and often transparent, and they have heterogeneous biological composition and structure over micro- and macroscales. As a result, it is challenging to quantify the spatial distribution and overall intensity of biofilms. In this work, a new method was developed to enhance the visibility and quantification of bacterial biofilms. First, broad-spectrum biomolecular staining was used to enhance the visibility of the cells, nucleic acids, and proteins that make up biofilms. Then, an image analysis algorithm was developed to objectively and quantitatively measure biofilm accumulation from digital photographs and results were compared to independent measurements of cell density. This new method was used to quantify the growth intensity of Pseudomonas putida biofilms as they grew over time. This method is simple and fast, and can quantify biofilm growth over a large area with approximately the same precision as the more laborious cell counting method. Stained and processed images facilitate assessment of spatial heterogeneity of a biofilm across a surface. This new approach to biofilm analysis could be applied in studies of natural, industrial, and environmental biofilms.Graphical abstractA novel photographic method was developed to quantify bacterial biofilms. Broad spectrum biomolecular staining enhanced the visibility of the biofilms. Image analysis objectively and quantitatively measured biofilm accumulation from digital photographs. When compared to independent measurements of cell density the new method accurately quantified growth of Pseudomonas putida biofilms as they grew over time. The graph shows a comparison of biofilm quantification from cell density and image analysis. Error bars show standard deviation from three independent samples. Inset photographs show effect of stainingElectronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00216-015-9195-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Computational flow cytometry of planktonic populations for the evaluation of microbiological-control programs in district cooling plants

“…Current methodologies for direct biofouling quantitation typically rely on significant processing or lab cultivation of biofilm samples 28,29 that may confound interpretation (although in certain cases, side line-installed corrosion coupons and bioprobes can provide insight). For biofouling to be properly quantified it is essential that in situ growth is measured over a fixed surface area in a given unit of time (such as by deployment of a biofilm sampling device, housing coupons with suitable surface characteristics) which can be impractical for DCP operators.…”

Quantitative assessment of individual populations within polymicrobial biofilms

“…enhanced resistance to antimicrobial therapy, protection towards host immunity, better adaptation to hostile surrounding conditions) 3 – 5 . The recognition that most biofilms present a spatiotemporal heterogeneous chemical, physiological and genetic composition 6 , 7 and typically comprise multiple species 8 poses a serious concern in health care regarding the synergies that arise from the residing species that generally turn infections more severe and recalcitrant to treatment 5 , 9 , 10 . This highlights the need for reliable technologies that comprehensively diagnose polymicrobial biofilm infections, by clearly addressing each individual member in the community, for accurate and timely therapeutic decisions.…”

Coomassie Blue G250 for Visualization of Active Bacteria from Lake Environment and Culture

“…According to our knowledge, G250 is not commonly used for the direct visualization of the planktonic microorganisms. The reason for this could be that the absorbance of Coomassie Blue is inadequate for a quality visualization of small microorganisms, however it can be used for showing large protein-rich biofilms structure (Larimer et al, 2016). The observed infrared light emission by Coomassie Blue (Luo et al, 2006;Carlsson et al, 2012) is not useful for visual observation and inconvenient for digital camera detection.…”