2018
DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2018.00654
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Method for Simultaneous Evaluation of Muscular and Neural Prepulse Inhibition

Abstract: Prepulse inhibition (PPI) test has been widely used to evaluate sensorimotor gating. In humans, deficits in this mechanism are measured through the orbicularis muscle response using electromyography (EMG). Although this mechanism can be modulated by several brain structures and is impaired in some pathologies as schizophrenia and bipolar disorder, neural PPI evaluation is rarely performed in humans. Since eye blinks are a consequence of PPI stimulation, they strongly contaminate the electroencephalogram (EEG) … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, we observed reduction in neural %PPI for both BP and SZ patients. These findings suggest that the evaluation of neural PPI may detect gating impairments in a broader manner than the classical muscular PPI paradigm [ 52 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In addition, we observed reduction in neural %PPI for both BP and SZ patients. These findings suggest that the evaluation of neural PPI may detect gating impairments in a broader manner than the classical muscular PPI paradigm [ 52 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The frontal electrodes were the most contaminated by eye-blink artifacts, and the cleaning process may have attenuated the signal in these regions [ 72 ]. Sixth, there are several distinct protocols of PPI test, including different intensities, duration, and source of stimuli; herein, we opted to use a set up similar to those used in many studies with schizophrenia and/or bipolar patients [ 22 , 32 , 36 , 95 ] and those used in our previous study [ 52 ]. Seventh, we did match cases and controls for potential confounding variables (gender, age group, and educational level), but did not control for potential confounding of smoking status.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations