2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2011.05.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A method for stochastic multiple criteria decision making based on dominance degrees

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(98 reference statements)
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be seen from Table 4 that the results obtained by the proposed SDD method and those by the existing methods are slightly different. However, the proposed method and Liu and Fan's method [18] could produce more accurate results than the others. When comparing with the existing methods, the new method takes the risk preference styles and group utility distribution of stakeholders into account.…”
Section: Comparative Analysis and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It can be seen from Table 4 that the results obtained by the proposed SDD method and those by the existing methods are slightly different. However, the proposed method and Liu and Fan's method [18] could produce more accurate results than the others. When comparing with the existing methods, the new method takes the risk preference styles and group utility distribution of stakeholders into account.…”
Section: Comparative Analysis and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…The results obtained by different SDD, Zaras and Martel's method [29], Nowak's method [12], and Liu and Fan's method [18] are shown in Table 4. It can be seen from Table 4 that the results obtained by the proposed SDD method and those by the existing methods are slightly different.…”
Section: Comparative Analysis and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Many classical and extended decision rules designed for pure or mixed MDMU (multi-criteria decision-making under uncertainty) have been already developed, e.g. [Aghdaie et al, 2013;Ben Amor et al, 2007;Dominiak, 2006;Durbach, 2014;Eiselt, Marianov, 2014;GasparsWieloch, 2014d;2015c;2015d;2017;Ginevičius, Zubrecovas, 2009;Goodwin, Wright, 2001;Hopfe et al, 2013;Janjic et al, 2013;Korhonen, 2001;Lee, 2012;Liu et al, 2011;Lo, Michnik, 2010;Michnik, 2013;Mikhaidov, Tsvetinov, 2004;Montibeller et al, 2006;Ram et al, 2010;Ramik et al, 2008;Ravindran, 2008;Silva, 2016;Stewart, 2005;Suo et al, 2012;Troutt, Pettypool, 1989;Tsaur et al, 2002;Urli, Nadeau, 2004;Wojewnik, Szapiro, 2010;Xu, 2000;Yu, 2002]. Some of them can be applied when the DM intends to perform the selected alternative only once (one-shot decisions).…”
Section: How To Combine Criteria With Scenarios In Uncertain Multi-crmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many classical and extended decision rules designed for multi-criteria decision making under uncertainty, e.g. [1], [2], [7], [8], [11], [13], [20], [24], [25], [28], [29], [34], [36], [40], [41], [42], [45], [48], [49], [50], [51], [56], [57], [58], [61], [62], [63], [65], [66], [71], [74], [75], [76], however the majority of the methods refer to probability calculus. Hence, those contributions are not directly related to the topic investigated in this paper, since here we concentrate on totally new decision problems for which frequencies are not known.…”
Section: Uncertain Multi-criteria Decision Making and 1-stage Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%