1999
DOI: 10.1109/20.800802
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A method for suppressing error propagation in (1,7) MDFE detectors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The advantage of this approach is that there is no false detection. Since the proportion of constraint violating error events is much more than constraint satisfying error events [4], we do not address the detection/suppression of the latter in this paper. .…”
Section: Path Selection and Detection/suppression Of Error Propagmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The advantage of this approach is that there is no false detection. Since the proportion of constraint violating error events is much more than constraint satisfying error events [4], we do not address the detection/suppression of the latter in this paper. .…”
Section: Path Selection and Detection/suppression Of Error Propagmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assuming the noise in (1) is a zero-mean Gaussian random variable with variance , the conditional pdf's in (4) can be written as (5) (6) where (outer eye-levels) or (inner eye-levels) depending upon the data pattern , and is given by…”
Section: Conditional Map Technique For Suppressing Long Error Burstsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Replacing an unreliable decision by a temporary decision and correcting the latter based on the decision at the next instant was proposed by Fertner [6] for reducing EP in DFE. Techniques for minimizing EP in MDFE were proposed by Mathew et al [7], Ueno et al [8], [9], and Likhanov et al [10]. Mathew et al [7] developed threshold techniques for detecting the presence of erroneous decisions and changed the slicer threshold appropriately to prevent further decision errors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%