1993
DOI: 10.1107/s0021889892011592
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A method for the accurate determination of crystal truncation rod intensities by X-ray diffraction

Abstract: A method is described for determining the structure factor F(Q) at a scattering vector Q along a crystal truncation rod (CTR) by measuring the total power diffracted with the crystal fixed. When a detector collects the entire diffracted beam, PCTR/ P0 = pσT[λ|F(Q)|/a0 sin θ sin χ]2, where P0 and PCTR are the powers of the incident and diffracted beams, p is a polarization factor, σT is the Thompson cross section, λ is the X‐ray wavelength, a0 is the area of a two‐dimensional unit cell and θ and χ are diffracto… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
40
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is largely due to the use of point (or linear) detectors. For the large acceptance required in the stationary mode a large amount of background is then collected and it is necessary to measure the background by rotating the crystal over a sufficiently wide angle (Specht & Walker, 1993). These extra 'scans' significantly lower the ratio in (64).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is largely due to the use of point (or linear) detectors. For the large acceptance required in the stationary mode a large amount of background is then collected and it is necessary to measure the background by rotating the crystal over a sufficiently wide angle (Specht & Walker, 1993). These extra 'scans' significantly lower the ratio in (64).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We compile the full pole figure by appropriately merging the [intensity, χ] data sets extracted from the local-specular diffraction pattern and the grazing incidence diffraction pattern. To determine an appropriate merging angle for these two data sets, we plot intensity vs. A Lorentz correction [36][37][38] is required in X-ray geometries that involves either a rotating single crystal or a stationary powder sample. However, in the present case of morphology quantification (as opposed to structural characterization) the data are obtained from a single Bragg ring, which obviates the need for a Lorentz correction.…”
Section: χ-Correctionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The instrument function depends on the wavelengths passed by the monochromator, the divergence of the beam and the angular acceptance of the detector (Munkholm et al, 1997). In our experimental set-up, the shape of the instrument function is mainly dominated by the large angular acceptance of the detector: 8 mrad in the scattering plane and 2 mrad perpendicular to the scattering plane, which is a consequence of using the slit setting of Specht & Walker (1993). The angular acceptance results in a plane of allowed scattering vectors that is inclined with respect to the rod.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The total width 3 of the CTR as measured using a rocking curve is a function of the horizontal angular acceptance of detector b and can be derived from equation (10) given by Specht & Walker (1993) as w ba2tan 1acos X 23…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation