2002
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.10126
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A method for the direct electrical stimulation of the auditory system in deaf subjects: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study

Abstract: Purpose: To develop a safe functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) procedure for auditory assessment of deaf subjects. Materials and Methods:A gold-plated tungsten electrode has been developed which has zero magnetic susceptibility. Used with carbon leads and a carbon reference pad, it enables safe, distortion-free fMRI studies of deaf subjects following direct electrical stimulation of the acoustic nerve. Minor pickup of the radio frequency (RF) pulses by the electrode assembly is difficult to eliminate,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(17 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The recent use of deep brain electrical stimulation in human fMRI studies shows that it should be possible to perform safe functional MR imaging by modifying not only the tip region of the electrode, but also the arrangement of the electrodes, connecting wires, and coil (Gleason et al, 1992;Berthezene et al, 1997;Obler et al, 1999;Tronnier et al, 1999;Alwatban et al, 2002;Rezai et al, 2002). One of the concerns about MR compatibility is the interaction between the electrode and the time-varying magnetic field in the presence of a conducting loop (Tenforde, 1986).…”
Section: Electrode Interferencementioning
confidence: 98%
“…The recent use of deep brain electrical stimulation in human fMRI studies shows that it should be possible to perform safe functional MR imaging by modifying not only the tip region of the electrode, but also the arrangement of the electrodes, connecting wires, and coil (Gleason et al, 1992;Berthezene et al, 1997;Obler et al, 1999;Tronnier et al, 1999;Alwatban et al, 2002;Rezai et al, 2002). One of the concerns about MR compatibility is the interaction between the electrode and the time-varying magnetic field in the presence of a conducting loop (Tenforde, 1986).…”
Section: Electrode Interferencementioning
confidence: 98%
“… 1,2 Activation in the primary and secondary auditory cortices has been consistently detected using fMRI in normal‐hearing adults and children as well as in hearing‐impaired patients. 3–11 Despite the detailed information available on fMRI of the auditory cortex activation, only a few studies have evaluated activation in the subcortical auditory pathway. 12,13 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cortical activation upon unilateral electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in bilaterally or unilaterally deaf subjects has been mainly observed bilaterally in PET and fMRI studies [Alwatban et al, 2002;Berthezene et al, 1997;Tschopp et al, 2000]. With normal-hearing subjects, however, unilateral acoustic stimulation evoked strong contralateralization of cortical fMRI response, and a binaural stimulation evoked a nearly balanced activation [Ito et al, 2004;Scheffler et al, 1998].…”
Section: Lateralitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…fMRI activation of the primary auditory cortex has been demonstrated during electrical stimulation of the promontory [Alwatban et al, 2002;Berthezene et al, 1997;Schmidt et al, 2003] as well as during ECS [Hofmann et al, 1999;Knaus et al, 2000]. Promontory stimulation induced activation in the contralateral auditory cortex in 85% of deaf patients who reported auditory sensations, whereas only 25% of patients without auditory sensations showed comparable activations [Schmidt et al, 2003].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation