2017
DOI: 10.1190/geo2016-0164.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A method of combining coherence-constrained sparse coding and dictionary learning for denoising

Abstract: We have addressed the seismic data denoising problem, in which the noise is random and has an unknown spatiotemporally varying variance. In seismic data processing, random noise is often attenuated using transform-based methods. The success of these methods in denoising depends on the ability of the transform to efficiently describe the signal features in the data. Fixed transforms (e.g., wavelets, curvelets) do not adapt to the data and might fail to efficiently describe complex morphologies in the seismic da… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the process of seismic data acquisition, the ideal tensor is observed in the presence of random noise [28], thus the mathematical model is given by…”
Section: Problem Statement and Formulation A Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the process of seismic data acquisition, the ideal tensor is observed in the presence of random noise [28], thus the mathematical model is given by…”
Section: Problem Statement and Formulation A Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To overcome the above difficulty, the threshold of sparsity needs to be independent of the noise variance [45]. For the consideration of satisfying this condition, [28] exploited the coherence threshold of residual R with respect to the dictionary D. Extending this to the tensor version, we propose the TSC-SAC model to solve these two problems, constraining the sparsity by tensor spatially adaptive coherence.…”
Section: B Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…have been designed for seismic random noise reduction to meet the demands of the development in seismic exploration, such as wavelet transform-based denoising methods [1], [2], time-frequency peak filters [3]- [5], sparse representation [6], PDE-based diffusion filters [7], [8]. Although these denoising methods highly improve the quality of seismic images, the denoising performances still need to be improved under the condition of low SNR and spatiotemporally variant seismic random noise.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For more efficient training, DDTF, sparse K-SVD, and SuKro learn structured dictionaries: In DDTF, the dictionary is constrained to be a tight frame; in sparse K-SVD, the atoms are constructed as sparse linear combinations of predefined basis functions; and in SuKro, the learned dictionary is a sum of the Kronecker products of smaller dictionaries. The DL methods have proven to perform well for denoising seismic data (Beckouche and Ma, 2014;Liang et al, 2014;Yu et al, 2015Yu et al, , 2016Zhu et al, 2015;Turquais et al, 2017). Another data-driven method, the Cadzow filtering method (Trickett, 2002(Trickett, , 2008, also called singular spectrum analysis (SSA) (Sacchi, 2009;Chen and Sacchi, 2015), uses rank reduction for denoising.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%