1958
DOI: 10.1093/jee/51.3.303
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Method of Rearing Large Colonies of an Eriophyid Mite, Aceria tulipae (Keifer), in Pure Culture from Single Eggs or Adults1

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1962
1962
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Adults from our colony were put on each piece of leaf in groups of two or three. For mite transfer, we used a long darning needle rather than hairs (del Rosario & Sill, 1958), because this allowed us to move not only single individuals of each development stage, but also clusters of about 10 eriophyids.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Adults from our colony were put on each piece of leaf in groups of two or three. For mite transfer, we used a long darning needle rather than hairs (del Rosario & Sill, 1958), because this allowed us to move not only single individuals of each development stage, but also clusters of about 10 eriophyids.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fifteen years later, an eriophyid species infesting North American wheat and suspected to be the vector of the Wheat Streak Mosaic Virus was identified as A. tulipae (Slykhuis, 1953). During the next three decades, several studies were published on the biology of these mites found on wheat and named as A. tulipae (Slykhuis, 1955;Slykhuis & Horricks, 1954;Connin, 1956;Gibson, 1957;del Rosario & Sill, 1958, 1964, 1965Pop, 1961;Nault & Styer, 1969). However, the works of the Russian acarologists Razvyazkina (1966) and later Shevtchenko, De-Millo, Razvyazkina & Kapkova (1970) threw some suspicion on the presence of A. tulipae on wheat in Europe and raised a controversy on the host range of A. tulipae which could be restricted to Liliaceae.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sidwetwiwat (46) found that WCM biotypes were as variab!e on a sing!e head of wheat as in an entire field, and Seifers (38) and Coutts (15) found regional variation in the transmission of WMoV and WSMV from different sources of WCM. Our research {data not shown) and Sidwetwiwat (46) have found that WCMs reproduce more quickly on plants infected with WSMV collected in the same geographic area as the WCMs, indicating that the capacity of WCMs to reproduce is reduced on a host to which it is not adapted (16,32). This was seen in our laboratory, where WCMs collected from many grass species would not feed and reproduce on wheat, and with other edophyid mites such as the cereal rust mite {Abacarus hystrix Na!epa; 48).…”
Section: Host Speciesmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…However, comparisons between treatments should still be accurate. WCM may be negatively phototactic (5,18), even under favorable conditions, and did tend to try to move out of the light when leaves were being examined under the dissecting microscope. The percent WCM that were living may have resulted from at least two different processes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%