2013
DOI: 10.1007/s00466-013-0872-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A method of two-scale analysis with micro-macro decoupling scheme: application to hyperelastic composite materials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
73
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
73
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the main driving forces behind the advancement of multiscale techniques is the pressing need for more accurate computational tools for prediction of material response in situations where the macroscale effects of complex micro-scale mechanisms cannot be easily captured by the conventional phenomenological modelling approach. In this context, computational RVE-based methods can be used either in the simulation of macroscopic structures by a coupled multiscale approach (often referred to as FE 2 ) or as a basis for the development of new phenomenological models, or calibration of material parameters of existing models, by means of so-called numerical material testing [32,38,94,113,119,120,129]. An interesting application in this context is the development of constitutive laws for micromorphic materials [27,28,31,50,51].…”
Section: Current Trends and Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the main driving forces behind the advancement of multiscale techniques is the pressing need for more accurate computational tools for prediction of material response in situations where the macroscale effects of complex micro-scale mechanisms cannot be easily captured by the conventional phenomenological modelling approach. In this context, computational RVE-based methods can be used either in the simulation of macroscopic structures by a coupled multiscale approach (often referred to as FE 2 ) or as a basis for the development of new phenomenological models, or calibration of material parameters of existing models, by means of so-called numerical material testing [32,38,94,113,119,120,129]. An interesting application in this context is the development of constitutive laws for micromorphic materials [27,28,31,50,51].…”
Section: Current Trends and Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerical material testing, which is a term coined by the authors , is nothing but microscopic analysis within the framework of computational homogenization and can be recognized as homogenization analysis in the context of mutliscale analysis. Because the purpose of the testing is to evaluate the macroscopic material properties for realistic composite materials and is exactly the same as actual material testing, we prefer to using NMT rather than VT sometimes used in the literature .…”
Section: Homogenizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A representative volume element (RVE), which contains enough information of micro‐scale heterogeneities, is used to characterize the macroscopic material behavior of composite materials. Homogenization analysis with FEM conducted on a RVE can be regarded as numerical material testing (NMT) or numerical plate testing (NPT) , in which a periodic or in‐plane periodic microstructure (unit cell) is employed as a RVE and used to resemble a specimen. Because the NMT, is also referred to as the virtual testing (VT) in the literature , is usually a finite element analysis (FEA) for the periodic boundary conditions (PBCs) on the displacement fields, the reliability of macroscopic material characterization is determined by the setting for the numerical models of unit cells.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A first straightforward approach, inspired by classical experimental identifications procedures, uses virtual tests on RVEs through numerical computations to identify empirical macroscopic constitutive laws (see, e.g., recent contributions in Terada et al, 2013Terada et al, , 2014. However, classifying such procedures as homogenization is questionable.…”
Section: Decoupled Computational Homogenization Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%