A Method to March Madness? Institutional Logics and the 2006 National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I Men’s Basketball Tournament

Abstract

As the United States’ largest intercollegiate athletic event, the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) Division I men’s basketball tournament consistently generates high television ratings and attracts higher levels of advertising spending than the Super Bowl or the World Series. Given the limited analysis of the organizational conditions that frame these broadcasts’ production, this study examines the impact of influential actors on the representation process. Using a mixed-method approach, this paper investigates production conditions and processes involved in producing a sample (n= 31) of NCAA Division I men’s basketball tournament broadcasts, examines the extent to which these broadcasts are consistent with the NCAA’s educational mission, and considers the dominant institutional logic that underpins their reproduction. In so doing, this analysis provides a critical examination of the 2006 NCAA Division I men’s basketball tournament broadcasts, and how such broadcasts constitute, and are constituted by, choices in television production structures and practices.

Parent Involvement in Young Adults’ Intercollegiate Athletic Careers: Developmental Considerations and Applied Recommendations

“…Lastly, although the present research addressed the role of parent involvement in student-athlete development, it is important to acknowledge that larger forces such as television networks, the NCAA, and professional sport franchises shape the culture and experiences of communities, universities, athletic departments, teams, and athletes (Beyer & Hannah, 2000;Clotfelter, 2011;Comeaux, 2015;Duderstadt, 2000;Noll, 2004;Toma, 2003). For example, the NCAA supports commercial policies that shape athletic department operations and that may or may not be aligned with the mission and academic values of a college or university (Southall, Nagel, Amis, & Southall, 2008). Future work could adopt an ecological approach (Bronfenbrenner, 2005) in addressing the independent and collective impact of these systems on student-athlete well-being.…”

For ‘Love’ and Money: A Sports Club’s Innovative Response to Multiple Logics

“…The change was from sport specific qualities to entertainment. The latest is the case study analysis of NCAA Division I Women's Basketball Tournament and the 2006 National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I Men's basketball Tournament (Southall, Nagel, Amis, & Southall, 2008) which highlighted two contradictory institutional logics, termed 'educational' and 'commercial. ' Heeding to the call of O'Brien and for further case analyses of individual sport organizations, the present work undertakes a case study of a local multisports club in Norway that has become more bureaucratized and professionalized and, in the process, changed the structure of the sports club and deinstitutionalized the amateur ethic in one of the units, the elite soccer.…”

An Examination of Public Private Academic Partnerships: Does Program Success Enhance University Performance Outcomes?

“…While we certainly don't discount the belief that university administrators are at times not rational, we submit that the primary additional benefit to the broadcasting of a university's athletic events is exposure, which administrators hope will then drive up enrollments, donations, and even state appropriations (Southall, et al 2008;Washington and Ventresca 2004). In 1994, Northwestern University appeared in its first Rose Bowl game in decades due to winning the big ten conference and the next year its US News and World Report ranking went from 13 to 9, which was notable both because (1) it is difficult to move multiple spots in the rankings when a university is ranked within the top 20 spots and (2) Northwestern lost the game (Fisher 2009).…”

“…Further, revenue from media rights deals is almost certainly the primary factor in the dramatic conference realignment which started in the early 1990's with the breakup of the legendary southwest conference and continues today with odd outcomes such as Rutgers University of New Jersey and the University of Maryland moving to the Big Ten conference, which was previously a league of Midwestern schools. Obviously the primary reason for the seemingly constant focus on media rights deals by college athletic administrators is money (Southall, Nagel, Amis, and Southall 2008). Over the past decade, major college conferences such as the Big Ten, The Southeastern Conference (SEC), the Atlantic Coast Conference (ACC), the Big 12 Conference, and the Pacific 12 Conference have all signed huge media rights deals, which can pay schools more than $30 million annually for the simple right to broadcast the university's athletics contests.…”