An Examination of Public Private Academic Partnerships: Does Program Success Enhance University Performance Outcomes?

Abstract

In response to a steady decline in State funding, universities have become heavily involved in a variety of public private academic partnerships (PPAPs) in such areas as medical research, business incubation, technological commercialization, continuing professional education, and intercollegiate athletics. Despite this trend, research which examines if such partnerships actually enhance university funding is rare within the public organization literature. Given this, we focus on university intercollegiate athletics programs, which represent one of the largest PPAPs ever undertaken by universities, to examine whether PPAP success can potentially enhance university performance outcomes leading to increased funding levels. Such programs represent a PPAP because public, private, and academic entities all come together to form an organization (division 1 football at the bowl subdivision level) which seeks to benefit all three entities through sharing resources and responsibilities. Study results showed that athletic success positively influenced a variety of university performance outcome variables such as enrollments and endowments. While results indicate that PPAP success can enhance university funding, we also suggest modifications that should enhance the chances that PPAPs will be successful.

Democratising Smart Cities? Penta-Helix Multistakeholder Social Innovation Framework

“…The PPAP model, as an evolution of the traditional PPP, encourages academic partners not only to participate in the delivery of services, but also to benefit from the active learning process while the public and private partners benefit from harnessing the research capacity of the university [116]. PPAP essentially resonates with the triple-helix multistakeholder framework ( Table 2).…”

Techniques for upgrading educational standards in tourism: how to integrate business circles into university research?

“…Qualitative content analysis methodology. 4. Quantitative content analysis of Internet resources in order to analyse domestic and international experience of inclusion of entrepreneurship into the research programs of universities.…”

Risks in Public–Private Partnerships: A Systematic Literature Review of Risk Factors, Their Impact and Risk Mitigation Strategies

“…Risks concerning communication at the right time often refer to the initial phase of a PPP. Especially at the beginning, before the contracts are signed and the working phase starts, partners might not focus sufficiently on communication (Murphy et al, 2016).…”

“…Mitigation: One mitigation strategy to foster the sharing of information and the interaction between partners is to establish frequent communication, for example, through weekly meetings or regular exchange (Monios & Lambert, 2013;Nisar, 2007b). In the early stage of a partnership, the goals of a project are usually not clearly defined; therefore extensive interaction is required before partners reach a contract agreement (Murphy et al, 2016). In addition, there is also a need for communication through different channels, such as personal communication, meetings or e-mails (Forrer et al, 2010).…”