2016
DOI: 10.1111/jan.12946
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A methodological review of qualitative case study methodology in midwifery research

Abstract: This review raises the profile of case study research in midwifery. Midwives will be encouraged to explore if case study research is suitable for their investigation. The raised profile will demonstrate further applicability; encourage support and wider adoption in the midwifery setting.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Prior to this intensive group discussion, the second coder independently read all transcripts and made notes regarding codes, categories, and themes for comparison to the initial analysis performed by the primary author. This approach is recommended by several methodologists in order to preserve the interpretive process at the core of qualitative analysis [ 30 ], and is consistent with current case study practice [ 31 ], in specific, and generally accepted qualitative research reporting criteria [ 32 ]. Themes were classified according to time orientation (i.e., past, present, future) and whether it reflected a barrier or facilitator to program operations.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior to this intensive group discussion, the second coder independently read all transcripts and made notes regarding codes, categories, and themes for comparison to the initial analysis performed by the primary author. This approach is recommended by several methodologists in order to preserve the interpretive process at the core of qualitative analysis [ 30 ], and is consistent with current case study practice [ 31 ], in specific, and generally accepted qualitative research reporting criteria [ 32 ]. Themes were classified according to time orientation (i.e., past, present, future) and whether it reflected a barrier or facilitator to program operations.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This research employs an exploratory approach. It is one of “types” of qualitative case studies that concern on debating the value of further research and suggesting various hypotheses (Atchan, Davis, & Foureur, , p. 4) as its research outcome. This approach is appropriate and useful to “learn what is common and what is particular about the case.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[42][43][44] If needed, discrepancies will be resolved by a third party. This approach is recommended by several methodologists in order to preserve the interpretive process at the core of qualitative analysis, 45 and is consistent with current case study practice, 46 in specific, and qualitative research reporting criteria, 47 in general.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Five of these seven studies were included in our metaanalysis. A single-site study by Thorpe et al [46] which observed no effect (HR, 1.29, 95% CI, 0.6-2.79) from NEP participation on HCV infection contained data that were also included in the Holtzman et al [42] multi-site study. Therefore, we excluded this study from the final model to maintain the criterion of independence of effect sizes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation