2012
DOI: 10.17265/1934-7359/2012.09.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Methodology for Bridge Condition Evaluation

Abstract: Due to the substantial role of bridges in transportation networks and in accordance with the limited funding for bridge management, remediation strategies have to be prioritised. A conservative bridge assessment will result in unnecessary actions, such as costly bridge strengthening or repairs. On the other hand, any bridge maintenance negligence and delayed actions may lead to heavy future costs or degraded assets. The accuracy of decisions developed by any manager or bridge engineer relies on the accuracy of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
15
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 1 presents the vulnerability factor of common materials used in concrete bridges introduced as Mi which is obtained from the work of Valenzuela et al (2010) 6 and validated by the judgements of structural engineers. Based on vulnerability of different materials it varies between 1 and 4 7 .…”
Section: Phase One: Project Rankingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Table 1 presents the vulnerability factor of common materials used in concrete bridges introduced as Mi which is obtained from the work of Valenzuela et al (2010) 6 and validated by the judgements of structural engineers. Based on vulnerability of different materials it varies between 1 and 4 7 .…”
Section: Phase One: Project Rankingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The weights of the involved parameters have been estimated using AHP and the associated ratings are defined based on the classifications presented in Table 1. 7 (2)…”
Section: Phase One: Project Rankingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In through visual inspection, bridge inspectors evaluate the condition of a bridge using their personal experience and following guidelines such as those found in inspector's manuals. The visual inspection incorporates many parameters and human judgments that may produce slightly uncertain and imprecise results [2]. It would be ideal to conduct physical structural tests on each bridge component, but it would be impractical and economically prohibitive to implement them, given the large number of bridges to be inspected within a given period.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The four condition states are (1) Excellent, (2) Good; (3) Fair; and (4) Poor (see Ministry of Transportation 2008 andAmerican Association of State Highway andTransportation Officials 2007). The accuracy of bridge rating and management decisions of bridge engineers reliy on the accuracy of the bridge condition assessment (Rashidi and Gibson 2012), mainly based on different levels of visual inspection. Different bridge management systems recognize many types of visual inspection such as the typical visual inspection (VI), in-depth VI, and enhanced in-depth VI (see FHWA-RD-01-020, Ministry of Transportation 2008 and American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%