2016
DOI: 10.1002/cnm.2834
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A methodology for constraining power in finite element modeling of radiofrequency ablation

Abstract: Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a minimally invasive thermal therapy for the treatment of cancer, hyperopia, and cardiac tachyarrhythmia. In RFA, the power delivered to the tissue is a key parameter. The objective of this study was to establish a methodology for the finite element modeling of RFA with constant power. Because of changes in the electric conductivity of tissue with temperature, a nonconventional boundary value problem arises in the mathematic modeling of RFA: neither the voltage (Dirichlet condi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[12,13]. Several studies have also reported that the volume of the ablation zone tended to increase as the power output during RFA increased and that the power output was higher when RFA was done with HCl rather than saline [21,22]. Also, others have shown that the conductivity of HCl runs about 3-6 times higher than that of normal saline at the same concentrations [23], providing an explanation for why the ablation zone in HCl-RFA tends to be larger than in NS-RFA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…[12,13]. Several studies have also reported that the volume of the ablation zone tended to increase as the power output during RFA increased and that the power output was higher when RFA was done with HCl rather than saline [21,22]. Also, others have shown that the conductivity of HCl runs about 3-6 times higher than that of normal saline at the same concentrations [23], providing an explanation for why the ablation zone in HCl-RFA tends to be larger than in NS-RFA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…For a constant‐power ablation mode, Equation is augmented with a constant‐power constraint Ωσfalse(Tfalse)normalΦ·normalΦ0.1em0.1emnormald0.1emx=P, where Ω is the computational domain and P is the constant power imposed.…”
Section: Computational Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RAFEM-2 was an updated version taking into account the temperature dependence of electric and thermal conductivity [139][140][141] and has been described in detail before [51,142,152].…”
Section: Finite Element Methods Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%