2013
DOI: 10.1080/0951192x.2013.800235
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A methodology for the evaluation of interoperability improvements in inter-enterprises collaboration based on causal performance measurement models

Abstract: International audienceThis article proposes a framework and methodology to evaluate and improve the interoperability for each partner of an inter-enterprises collaboration. The framework is based on the decomposition of business processes into non-value-added (NVA) and business activities and it is also based on process performance indicators (PIs) to measure interoperability. The developed methodology is then founded on this framework and is aimed to provide support for validating interoperability solutions. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
15
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be divided into the four sections of linear-elastic deformation, partial pullout, complete pullout, and interface friction. This agrees with the conclusions drawn in literature [37,38]. However, there is an obvious stress oscillation in the interface friction section in our study in a full consideration of the friction between the fiber and the matrix and the use of material model BISO.…”
Section: The Fiber Pullout On the Ideal Interfacesupporting
confidence: 82%
“…It can be divided into the four sections of linear-elastic deformation, partial pullout, complete pullout, and interface friction. This agrees with the conclusions drawn in literature [37,38]. However, there is an obvious stress oscillation in the interface friction section in our study in a full consideration of the friction between the fiber and the matrix and the use of material model BISO.…”
Section: The Fiber Pullout On the Ideal Interfacesupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The performance and interoperability measurement of an EIS becomes then a strong topic in the sense there are very few research works on it, mainly at the technical level as the Business Activity Monitoring. Few works have been carried out in the frame of interoperability performance measurement (Camara et al 2014). They mainly define the measurement principles and generic indicators for organizational interoperability.…”
Section: Modelling Indicators In Next Gen Eismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They mainly define the measurement principles and generic indicators for organizational interoperability. Zacharewicz et al (2009) and Camara et al (2014) described that dynamic perspective through simulation is being an appropriate way to validate EIS process scenario. In addition, if there is a gap between the objective and the results obtained by simulation, value-based model analysis and optimization have to be addressed (Wang et al 2010).…”
Section: Modelling Indicators In Next Gen Eismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the maturity models [6,7,8]: repetition, ambiguity, imprecision and incoherence because the needs are expressed in natural language [9]. 2. formal representation of interoperability requirements [9,10]: the implementation of this approach may experiment scalability problems [11]. 3. interoperability requirements as problems a) requirements are specified by the mean of collaboration processes models: the requirements are disconnected from existing systems and also to the interoperability problems to solve b) the interoperability matrix [12,13]: do not provide a structured set of requirements [14].…”
Section: Interoperability Requirementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this research, the considered process PIs are the average elapsed time, average cost and percentage of failure at the process level and represent the aggregation of the PIs for the activities [24,25]. This choice relies on the assumption that these characteristics encompass all other types of dynamic properties of business processes [11].…”
Section: Business Process Performance Indicators Calculation From Evementioning
confidence: 99%