2022
DOI: 10.1109/access.2022.3147879
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Methodology to Derive a Symbolic Transfer Function for Multistage Amplifiers

Abstract: In this paper, a simple while effective methodology to calculate the symbolic transfer function of a multistage amplifier with frequency compensation is proposed. Three general amplifier models are introduced and analyzed, which represent basic topologies found in the literature. For these amplifier models, the symbolic transfer function is derived and specific strategies for the zero and nondominant pole expressions are presented. The methodology is suited for hand calculations and yields accurate results whi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
(79 reference statements)
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The main elements of the frequency compensation network are the series R D1 , C D1 , and R D2 , C D2 around the second and the third stages, respectively, besides the Miller C C /2 capacitors between v O and the source of M 6 and M 8 that implement the embedded g mC transconductances without any power overhead. These devices with a relatively light 1/g mC input impedance close the parallel feedback pathways from v O to the input, moving a right-half-plane (RHP) zero to very high frequencies by minimizing a feedforward current to flow to the output via either C C /2 [34]. The hybrid nature of the compensation network also allows designers to achieve a balanced time response during the falls and rises of v O , unlike the classical solution which possibly connects C C to the source of M 6 or M 8 .…”
Section: Proposed Topologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The main elements of the frequency compensation network are the series R D1 , C D1 , and R D2 , C D2 around the second and the third stages, respectively, besides the Miller C C /2 capacitors between v O and the source of M 6 and M 8 that implement the embedded g mC transconductances without any power overhead. These devices with a relatively light 1/g mC input impedance close the parallel feedback pathways from v O to the input, moving a right-half-plane (RHP) zero to very high frequencies by minimizing a feedforward current to flow to the output via either C C /2 [34]. The hybrid nature of the compensation network also allows designers to achieve a balanced time response during the falls and rises of v O , unlike the classical solution which possibly connects C C to the source of M 6 or M 8 .…”
Section: Proposed Topologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…for the output impedances are subsequently dominated by C L , g mi and compensation elements. Under these circumstances, the methodology described in [34] can be used to approximate v O /v i as…”
Section: B Small-signal Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1. the equivalent transconductance of all stages is much greater than their output conductance (g mi , g m2 , g mL 1/R i ); 2. the nulling resistor R C is much lower than R D and both are much smaller than the output resistors (R C R D R i ); 3. the compensation capacitors are much lower than the load capacitor and all are much larger than the parasitic capacitors (C L C C , C D C i ), the simplified amplifier transfer function, using the methodology described in [43], can be expressed by…”
Section: B Transfer Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, an exact symbolic analysis of OTAs is error-prone and time-consuming if it is done by hand, even for circuits with a small number of components [6]. In this regard, a computer-aided automatic symbolic resolution can be helpful by solving the circuit equations by mathematical solvers such as Cramer's rule [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%