2013 ACS International Conference on Computer Systems and Applications (AICCSA) 2013
DOI: 10.1109/aiccsa.2013.6616492
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A methodology to spot words in historical Arabic documents

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4.2, the increase in the performance is significant. We also use Run Length Smoothing Algorithm (RLSA) [45,66] as another baseline to compare our proposed method, and have seen that RLSA is not able to capture the boundaries sufficiently as well (see Table 3 and Fig. 9).…”
Section: Results Of Word Segmentation In the Target Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4.2, the increase in the performance is significant. We also use Run Length Smoothing Algorithm (RLSA) [45,66] as another baseline to compare our proposed method, and have seen that RLSA is not able to capture the boundaries sufficiently as well (see Table 3 and Fig. 9).…”
Section: Results Of Word Segmentation In the Target Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are very few Arabic handwriting keyword spotting studies in the literature [6]. Some QbE studies ( [18][19][20]) are proposed for the historical Arabic documents and used a matching method adjusted to the Arabic script. QbS approaches [21,22] used the HMM technique for keyword spotting in handwritten Arabic manuscripts.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For both the aforementioned strategies, the core operational pipeline used relies upon two main components: features extraction and matching. Although there is a plethora of systems that are tailored for both modern [4,5] and historical machine-printed documents [6][7][8][9], in the case of handwritten documents, very few of them can be used effectively due to severe degradation, text layout complexity and variation in the writing style.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%