2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2015.10.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A micro-scale inspired chemo-mechanical model of bonded geomaterials

Abstract: a b s t r a c tChemical processes influence the mechanical properties of geomaterials, resulting in either strengthening or weakening effects, the latter being particularly critical for long-term safety assessment in civil and energy engineering. Coupling of chemical and mechanical processes in cemented soils and rocks is investigated starting form a micro-structural chemo-mechanical model. The model consists of an assembly of grains and bonds undergoing dissolution or precipitation of mineral mass, affecting … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite considerable progress made in recent years in the study of the interactions between the soil (or rock) mass and the environment (including hydraulic, thermal and chemical coupling phenomena) (Alonso et al 1990;Cekerevac and Laloui 2004;Della Vecchia and Romero 2013;Gajo et al 2015;Gens 2010;Hueckel and Borsetto 1990;Jommi 2000; Uchaipichat and Khalili 2009), the application of advanced models to perform 3D numerical simulations to address such question is rare. In particular, chemo-hydro-mechanical (CHM)-coupled advanced numerical simulations are usually performed for 2D idealized problems to show the robustness of integration schemes or to simulate laboratory-scale boundary value problems (Fernandez-Merodo et al 2007;Tamagnini et al 2002;Tamagnini and Ciantia 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite considerable progress made in recent years in the study of the interactions between the soil (or rock) mass and the environment (including hydraulic, thermal and chemical coupling phenomena) (Alonso et al 1990;Cekerevac and Laloui 2004;Della Vecchia and Romero 2013;Gajo et al 2015;Gens 2010;Hueckel and Borsetto 1990;Jommi 2000; Uchaipichat and Khalili 2009), the application of advanced models to perform 3D numerical simulations to address such question is rare. In particular, chemo-hydro-mechanical (CHM)-coupled advanced numerical simulations are usually performed for 2D idealized problems to show the robustness of integration schemes or to simulate laboratory-scale boundary value problems (Fernandez-Merodo et al 2007;Tamagnini et al 2002;Tamagnini and Ciantia 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such two cases imply a different overall behavior both at the micro-and at the macro-scale, bespoke modelling is required to address each situation. While in Gajo et al [26] a model was presented focused on the chemo-mechanical behavior of materials with both chemically reacting grain and bond minerals, this work further develops Gajo et al's [26] framework, building up on the cross-scale relationships and making it suitable to capture the chemo-mechanical behavior of bonded geomaterials with only reactive bond minerals and chemically inert grains.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Published experimental data on the loss/gain of strength of geomaterials due to chemo-mechanical effects are not particularly abundant. An account of the phenomenological and modeling background relevant to materials with both reactive grains and bonds, such as calcarenite, was given in [26] (see Section 2 therein), whereas here we review the published work on materials with chemically inert grains, but reactive bonds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To incorporate the microstructural properties in the defined specific reaction surface the geometric method (GM) [44] is used, by which all solid grains are idealised as spheres with identical average diameter, and all calcite bonds are assumed to be cylindrical with identical average length and radius. According to the study in [20,21], two different types of reaction surface in large and small porosity configurations are considered (Fig. 2).…”
Section: Biochemical Reactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%