2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2005.05.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A microcosm test of adaptation and species specific responses to polluted sediments applicable to indigenous chironomids (Diptera)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The genus level might therefore be appropriate for monitoring and there would be a substantial loss of information if monitoring only occurred at higher levels. The results also suggest that differences among congeneric species in pollution sensitivities might not be consistent when compared across sites; this requires further work although it might partly reflect local adaptation within chironomid species when collected from different sites (Groenendijk et al 2002;Bahrndorff et al 2006). Obviously these are general guidelines, whereas, the availability of a phylogeny means that specific recommendations can be made about pooling within particular phylogenetic nodes.…”
Section: Assessing Phylogenetic Signals: Nested Analyses Across Taxonmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…The genus level might therefore be appropriate for monitoring and there would be a substantial loss of information if monitoring only occurred at higher levels. The results also suggest that differences among congeneric species in pollution sensitivities might not be consistent when compared across sites; this requires further work although it might partly reflect local adaptation within chironomid species when collected from different sites (Groenendijk et al 2002;Bahrndorff et al 2006). Obviously these are general guidelines, whereas, the availability of a phylogeny means that specific recommendations can be made about pooling within particular phylogenetic nodes.…”
Section: Assessing Phylogenetic Signals: Nested Analyses Across Taxonmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…The reason why C. ambigua is successful in warm nutrient-rich Danish lakes is probably linked to local adaptation (cf. Bahrndorff et al 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Nevertheless, the same critical thresholds at which many of these species declined tended to support Pettigrove & Hoffmann (2005), and the lack of significant association in our field survey may reflect a lack of power and/or the influence of other environmental factors on the distribution of these species. Kiefferulus ‘tinctus’ may be more tolerant and C. ‘februarius’ may be less tolerant to sediment pollution than suggested by data in Pettigrove & Hoffmann (2005), although tolerance levels of C. ‘februarius’ can be confounded by adaptation (Bahrndorff et al. , 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%