“…The traditional wire mesh type regenerator is most popularly adopted in Stirling engines due to its huge heat transfer area, high convective heat transfer coefficient brought by the cross flow around numerous cylindrical shaped wires, and low axial thermal conductance. However, there are some inherent disadvantages associated with the wire mesh type regenerator [3], such as: (1) the numerous cylinders in cross flow produce flow separation, wakes, eddies and stagnation zones, resulting in high flow friction and considerable thermal dispersion, a loss mechanism that increases apparent axial conduction, damaging power output and engine efficiency; (2) the wire screens have some randomness in stacking, causing locally non-uniform porosity and flow distribution, which might increase axial conduction and damage its thermodynamic performance; (3) the mesh wires are subject to the impact of high-speed high-frequency oscillating flow during operation, so there exists the possibility of working loose or fiber breakage, thus damaging vital engine components; (4) the wire mesh type regenerator also requires long assembly time which tends to increase their cost.…”