For some years it has become increasingly evident that the methods originally proposed (1) for the isolation of the soluble specific substance (S) of pneumococcus were in need of revision. Avery and Goebel (2) and Enders and Pappenheimer (3) showed that more cautious manipulation of Type I pneumococcus or its culture filtrate led to the isolation of a product chemically and immunologically different from S I as originally described. Avery and Goebel presented evidence that these differences were due to a labile acetyl group which was removed by the treatment with alkali called for in the original method (1). We therefore undertook the preparation of the specific polysaccharides of Types II and III pneumococcus (S II and S III) without the use of alkali, and found no chemical differences (4) from the preparations made as originally described.Avery and Goebel (2) had also shown qualitatively that the acetyl S I precipitated antibody from Type I antipneumococcus horse serum which the alkali-treated, deacetylated S I failed to throw down. Our quantitative determinations on a Type I antibody solution showed that the new product precipitated 2.0 rag. of antibody nitrogen as compared with 1.3 rag. thrown down by the deacetylated product. However, the S II and S I I I preparations which had not been alkali-treated failed to precipitate more antibody from homologous antipneumococcus horse serum than did the older preparations.