2021
DOI: 10.3390/c7040074
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Mini Review of Recent Findings in Cellulose-, Polymer- and Graphene-Based Membranes for Fluoride Removal from Drinking Water

Abstract: Effective fluoride removal from water is a persistent global concern both for drinking water and wastewater treatment. According to World Health Organization (WHO), standards for the maximum contaminant level in drinking water cannot be higher than 1.5 mg F− L−1 since affects the skeletal and nervous systems of humans. Various technologies have been developed to decrease fluoride concentration from waters, such as adsorption, coagulation, precipitation and membrane separation. Membrane technology has been foun… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Efficacy influenced by materials used, with compliance to EPA's limit of less than 4 mg/L of fluoride in treated water [7]. Photocatalytic nanoparticles, like titanium dioxide, zinc oxide, and zinc sulfide [92].…”
Section: Photocatalysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Efficacy influenced by materials used, with compliance to EPA's limit of less than 4 mg/L of fluoride in treated water [7]. Photocatalytic nanoparticles, like titanium dioxide, zinc oxide, and zinc sulfide [92].…”
Section: Photocatalysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, a reduction in fluoride levels can weaken resistance to bacterial infections. In certain cases, drinking water with insufficient fluoride may lead to the emergence of fluoride-associated diseases, including fluorosis, periodontitis, and even cancer [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several treatment methods, such as precipitation [7][8][9], reverse osmosis [10], membrane separation [11][12][13], coagulation [14], etc., are commonly used to remove fluoride anions from water. However, the disadvantages of these technologies are that they have high costs and require expensive operational and labor costs and advanced technologies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various technologies have been developed for the removal of As and F in order to achieve these permissible limits [14][15][16][17][18], and among them, adsorption with modified activated carbons [19,20] is a very promising and widely applied technique [21,22]. However, several studies [12,17,23] have been carried out to investigate the simultaneous removal of arsenic and fluoride, and a reduction in the removal efficiency of one of the two pollutants is generally observed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%