2022
DOI: 10.1029/2022gl099250
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Minimally Cemented Shallow Crust Beneath InSight

Abstract: Cements in the Martian crust can have multiple origins, including ice frozen from liquid water or condensed from vapor, hydrated minerals formed in situ, or minerals precipitated from aqueous fluids (e.g., salts, carbonates, and sulfates). The presence, amount, and composition of ice and other mineral cements in the shallowest sections of the Martian crust have implications for robotic and human exploration of Mars, the processes that shape and shaped the surface, and the search for past or extant life. Resear… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although we do not provide constraints on the Moho depth, we have focused on the second seismic discontinuity as both the thinner and thicker crustal density models support a seismic discontinuity at 20 ± 5 km below the surface. Our study builds upon previous studies (Heap, 2019;Li et al, 2022;Manga & Wright, 2021;Wright et al, 2022) by considering models for both fractured and granular media (Heap, 2019;Manga & Wright, 2021), using more recently constrained InSight-derived velocities (Manga & Wright, 2021), and or interpreting seismic velocities constrained for a wider range of depths (0-20 km vs. the upper 300 m or 8 ± 2 km) (Li et al, 2022;Wright et al, 2022). Here, we infer that (a) the upper crust beneath InSight comprises layers of fractured gas-filled basalts and weakly cemented sediments, (b) the deeper crust could be fractured basalts or more felsic igneous rocks that are either unfractured or has up to 23% porosity, (c) the pores of fractured rocks in the deeper crust could host liquid water, gas, or 2% cement and 98% liquid water or gas, and (d) no seismically detected ice-saturated cryosphere layer exists beneath InSight.…”
mentioning
confidence: 53%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Although we do not provide constraints on the Moho depth, we have focused on the second seismic discontinuity as both the thinner and thicker crustal density models support a seismic discontinuity at 20 ± 5 km below the surface. Our study builds upon previous studies (Heap, 2019;Li et al, 2022;Manga & Wright, 2021;Wright et al, 2022) by considering models for both fractured and granular media (Heap, 2019;Manga & Wright, 2021), using more recently constrained InSight-derived velocities (Manga & Wright, 2021), and or interpreting seismic velocities constrained for a wider range of depths (0-20 km vs. the upper 300 m or 8 ± 2 km) (Li et al, 2022;Wright et al, 2022). Here, we infer that (a) the upper crust beneath InSight comprises layers of fractured gas-filled basalts and weakly cemented sediments, (b) the deeper crust could be fractured basalts or more felsic igneous rocks that are either unfractured or has up to 23% porosity, (c) the pores of fractured rocks in the deeper crust could host liquid water, gas, or 2% cement and 98% liquid water or gas, and (d) no seismically detected ice-saturated cryosphere layer exists beneath InSight.…”
mentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Last, we identify the ranges of ϕ, α, and pore-filling media that best explain measured V s . In selecting our aspect ratio ranges, we followed the examples from previous studies that considered aspect ratios of 0.03-1 (Heap, 2019), 0.03-1 (Manga & Wright, 2021;Wright et al, 2022), and 0.01 (Li et al, 2022). While both our study and Heap (2019) use fractured media models, Heap (2019) used the Kuster Toksöz (KT) fractured media model that approximates the elastic moduli through a first-order, long-wavelength scattering theory.…”
Section: Modeling V S For Fractured Rocksmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…They found velocities of v P = 119 +45 −21 m s −1 and v S = 63 +11 −7 m s −1 , consistent with values typically encountered in low-density unconsolidated sands. It has also been speculated that any cement at grain contacts within sediment layer at the InSight landing site may have been broken up by impacts or marsquakes (Wright et al, 2022), although this may be more relevant for deeper soil layers not probed by the HP 3 mole. Nagihara et al (2022) studied the dependence of thermal conductivity on atmospheric pressure in the lab using the low-cohesion Mojave Mars simulant (Peters et al, 2008) as an analogue for the martian soil.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%