2013 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 2013
DOI: 10.1109/cvpr.2013.181
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Minimum Error Vanishing Point Detection Approach for Uncalibrated Monocular Images of Man-Made Environments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
67
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
67
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, such a calibration has a poor accuracy. The reason is that existing methods for VP detection are not assessed on motion estimation; they are generally tuned regarding line clustering capacities as well as zenith and horizon estimation [1,2], with arbitrary ground truths. Moreover, VPs are theoretical constructs; they are not real.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, such a calibration has a poor accuracy. The reason is that existing methods for VP detection are not assessed on motion estimation; they are generally tuned regarding line clustering capacities as well as zenith and horizon estimation [1,2], with arbitrary ground truths. Moreover, VPs are theoretical constructs; they are not real.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Efficient search [26,8], direct clustering [29,17], multi-line RANSAC [4,34], EM procedures [1,15,27,12,35], or MCMC inference [28] are among the methods employed directly on the accumulator space. If a discretization is enforced on the accumalator space, the solutions are found by voting schemes [21,24,20,23] or inference over graphical models [30,2].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Line-VP consistency and VP refinement: The consistency between an estimated VP and the image lines is usually measured using line endpoint distances in the image, used by us and [29,12,4,2,17], the angular differences in the image [26,8], with explicit probabilistic modeling of the line end point errors [35], or with angles between normals of interpretation planes in the Gaussian sphere [21,24,20]. We sample MOVP candidates on the Gaussian sphere because testing for orthogonality directly translates to vector cross products, but revert to image-space fitting errors for refinement to avoid distorted errors and to attenuate dependance on (potentially) noisy internal camera calibration.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations