2009
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-02319-4_79
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Minimum-Risk Genetic Fuzzy Classifier Based on Low Quality Data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
1
1
1

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For removing the uncertainty of an input variable, intervals are replaced by its midpoint and fuzzy sets are replaced by their center of gravity. For removing the imprecision of an output variable, each sample is been replicated so many times as different alternatives exist, as described in [25]. Each replication is assigned a degree of importance such that the contribution of the example to the total fitness is not influenced by the number of replicas.…”
Section: Experimental Settingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For removing the uncertainty of an input variable, intervals are replaced by its midpoint and fuzzy sets are replaced by their center of gravity. For removing the imprecision of an output variable, each sample is been replicated so many times as different alternatives exist, as described in [25]. Each replication is assigned a degree of importance such that the contribution of the example to the total fitness is not influenced by the number of replicas.…”
Section: Experimental Settingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For using a GFS with an imbalanced dataset, either we can alter the fitness function by including a cost matrix [27] or we can preprocess the data. Both techniques have already been studied in the context of GFSs: there are works that deal with the use of fuzzy classifiers for the imbalanced dataset problem [10], [34], [36], [37], [41], and others that employ a preprocessing step in order to balance the training data before the training, which has been shown to solve the problem [1], [12], [13], [14], [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%