2011
DOI: 10.1134/s1028334x11060018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A mixed probabilistic-deterministic approach to interpretation of gravity, magnetic, and electric prospecting data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The solution that provides the minimum mathematical expectation of its error can be taken as the best one. In (Balk, 2010;Balk et al, 2011), this approach was implemented in the case of weak and rather realistic assumptions concerning the noise con tained in gravity measurements. However, this method also has its weak points; in any case, it does not solve the problems mentioned in the introduction that are associated with locating the geological bodies in the medium.…”
Section: The Sources Of Drawbacksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The solution that provides the minimum mathematical expectation of its error can be taken as the best one. In (Balk, 2010;Balk et al, 2011), this approach was implemented in the case of weak and rather realistic assumptions concerning the noise con tained in gravity measurements. However, this method also has its weak points; in any case, it does not solve the problems mentioned in the introduction that are associated with locating the geological bodies in the medium.…”
Section: The Sources Of Drawbacksmentioning
confidence: 99%