2004
DOI: 10.1016/s0191-2615(03)00005-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A mixed spatially correlated logit model: formulation and application to residential choice modeling

Abstract: In recent years, there have been important developments in the simulation analysis of the mixed multinomial logit (MMNL) model as well as in the formulation of increasingly flexible closedform models belonging to the Generalized Extreme Value (GEV) class. In this paper, we bring these developments together to propose a mixed spatially correlated logit (MSCL) model for location-related choices. The MSCL model represents a powerful approach to capture both random taste variations as well as spatial correlation i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
179
0
3

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 261 publications
(188 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
6
179
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, the parameter of the variable referring to home-work journey times was clearly significant in all the models at least a level of confidence of 90% with no significant differences between the overall group of households and the group with higher incomes. This result can therefore be considered to be compatible with the results obtained in previous research such as Guo and Bhat (2001) and Bhat and Guo (2004). The ''Residence/work'' variable referring to the location of work place and residence in the same zone also had a positive sign using all the models even if it was only significant at a confidence level of between 71% and 87%.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…On the other hand, the parameter of the variable referring to home-work journey times was clearly significant in all the models at least a level of confidence of 90% with no significant differences between the overall group of households and the group with higher incomes. This result can therefore be considered to be compatible with the results obtained in previous research such as Guo and Bhat (2001) and Bhat and Guo (2004). The ''Residence/work'' variable referring to the location of work place and residence in the same zone also had a positive sign using all the models even if it was only significant at a confidence level of between 71% and 87%.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Nevertheless, in order to limit the number of parameters to be estimated in the models, a technique that had been previously used in other studies (Bhat and Guo, 2004) was applied to establish the condition that a zone could only belong to those nests which presented common borders. Only alternatives 5 and 6 continued to hold direct connected with the root nest.…”
Section: Models Considering Spatial Correlation Between Alternatives:mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This type of spatial correlation has been examined primarily in the transportation and geography literatures (see Hunt et al, 2004). The common model structures to accommodate such inter-alternative spatial correlation include the mixed logit model (see Bolduc et al, 1996 andMiyamoto et al, 2004), the multinomial probit model (see Garrido andMahmassani, 2000 andBolduc et al, 1997), and a GEV-based spatially correlated logit (SCL) model (see Bhat and Guo, 2004). While spatial correlation across alternatives is an important component of modeling choice among multinomial spatial units, there are several choice occasions where the alternatives themselves are not spatial units.…”
Section: Discrete Choice Models With Spatial Error Autocorrelationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the data on dwelling's renovation is not available, observations of choices toward the dwelling with the higher price would lead to the erroneous conclusion that the sensitivity to price is smaller than it really is. Numerous empirical applications in residential location choice modeling have shown estimated coefficients of dwelling price that are non-significant or even positive when endogeneity is not taken into account (Guevara and Ben-Akiva, 2006;Bhat and Guo, 2004;Sermonss and Koppelman, 2001; Levine, 1998;Waddell, 1992;Quigley, 1976).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%