2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.sab.2014.06.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A model combining spectrum standardization and dominant factor based partial least square method for carbon analysis in coal using laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy

Abstract: Successful quantitative measurement of carbon content in coal using laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) is suffered from relatively low precision and accuracy. In the present work, the spectrum standardization method was combined with the dominant factor based partial least square (PLS) method to improve the measurement accuracy of carbon content in coal by LIBS. The combination model employed the spectrum standardization method to convert the carbon line intensity into standard state for more accurate… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most of these calibration methods use linear algebra to describe the relationship between the analyte concentration and the signal, despite the fact that LIBS calibration plots are often non-linear as a result of self absorption. Only a few authors have used nonlinear methods, including artificial neural networks [125,126], generalized linear correlation [63], or nonlinearized dominantfactor-based partial least squares (NDFPLS) [127,128], and reported on improved accuracy and precision. Non-linear methods will most probably become more popular in the future, because in addition to their better accuracy and precision they also enable a wider concentration range to be used for calibration.…”
Section: Quantitative Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of these calibration methods use linear algebra to describe the relationship between the analyte concentration and the signal, despite the fact that LIBS calibration plots are often non-linear as a result of self absorption. Only a few authors have used nonlinear methods, including artificial neural networks [125,126], generalized linear correlation [63], or nonlinearized dominantfactor-based partial least squares (NDFPLS) [127,128], and reported on improved accuracy and precision. Non-linear methods will most probably become more popular in the future, because in addition to their better accuracy and precision they also enable a wider concentration range to be used for calibration.…”
Section: Quantitative Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A series of studies have been conducted on LIBS applications for coal analysis, including elemental (ultimate) analysis [3][4][5] and coal property (proximate) analysis [6,7]. Wallis et al [3] measured the elemental composition of Si, Al, Fe, Ca, Mg, Na and Li [4] and Yuan et al [5] analyzed the carbon content.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wallis et al [3] measured the elemental composition of Si, Al, Fe, Ca, Mg, Na and Li [4] and Yuan et al [5] analyzed the carbon content. Dong et al [6] measured the volatile matter content.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The processed wavelet coefficients were taken as inputs for the PLS model for calibration and the prediction of the C content, and the hybrid model resulted in a substantial improvement over the conventional PLS method under different ambient environments (air, argon, and helium). Li et al proposed a combination model with spectrum standardization and the dominant factor‐based PLS method for the C analysis of 24 bituminous coal samples. The spectrum standardization method was used to accurately calculate the dominant carbon concentration as the dominant factor, and then PLS was applied with full spectrum information to correct residual errors.…”
Section: Quantitative Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%