2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.09.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A model experiment to understand the oral phase of swallowing of Newtonian liquids

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

7
47
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
7
47
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, individuals who have poor tongue 355 strength are likely to experience longer transit times than those with normal tongue strength. In addition, in those individuals the oral transit time of the bolus will be more sensitive to its rheology, meaning that overly thickened boluses are more likely to induce potentially hazardous fluid residue and bad swallowing efficiency, as discussed in the introduction and previously observed in 360 vitro (Hayoun et al, 2015).…”
Section: Physiological Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Consequently, individuals who have poor tongue 355 strength are likely to experience longer transit times than those with normal tongue strength. In addition, in those individuals the oral transit time of the bolus will be more sensitive to its rheology, meaning that overly thickened boluses are more likely to induce potentially hazardous fluid residue and bad swallowing efficiency, as discussed in the introduction and previously observed in 360 vitro (Hayoun et al, 2015).…”
Section: Physiological Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This device, shown in Figure 1, is based on a mouth-sized in vitro experiment initially designed by Mackley et al (2013) and later improved by Hayoun et al (2015). Without having the ambition of reproducing faithfully the in vivo process, the objective of this 90 study was to capture two essential features of the mouth and tongue.…”
Section: In Vitro Swallowing Simulatormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations