2012
DOI: 10.5424/fs/2012212-02398
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A model for predicting the growth of Eucalyptus globulus seedling stands in Bolivia

Abstract: Eucalyptus globulus is one of the most planted species in the Inter-Andean Valleys of Bolivia, where growing conditions are different from most places where eucalypts have been studied. This prevents a straightforward utilization of models fitted elsewhere. In this study a distance-independent individual-tree growth model for E. globulus plantations in Bolivia was developed based on data from 67 permanent sample plots. The model consists of sub-models for dominant height, tree diameter increment, height-diamet… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fixed-effects models are also inferior to mixed-effect models when the aim is to make inferences about the population. However, several studies have shown that a fixed-effects model results in a smaller root mean square error (RMSE) than using only the fixed part of a mixed-effects model (Temesgen, Monleon, & Hann, 2008;Garber, Temesgen, Monleon, & Hann, 2009;Pukkala et al, 2009;Shater, de-Miguel, Kraid, Pukkala, & Palahí, 2011;Groom, Hann, & Temesgen, 2012;Guzmán, Morales, Pukkala, & de-Miguel, 2012a, Guzmán, Pukkala, Palahí, & de-Miguel, 2012bHeiðarsson & Pukkala, 2012). De-Miguel, Guzmán, & Pukkala (2013) found that, in the absence of calibration data, mixed-effects models should be used with caution.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Fixed-effects models are also inferior to mixed-effect models when the aim is to make inferences about the population. However, several studies have shown that a fixed-effects model results in a smaller root mean square error (RMSE) than using only the fixed part of a mixed-effects model (Temesgen, Monleon, & Hann, 2008;Garber, Temesgen, Monleon, & Hann, 2009;Pukkala et al, 2009;Shater, de-Miguel, Kraid, Pukkala, & Palahí, 2011;Groom, Hann, & Temesgen, 2012;Guzmán, Morales, Pukkala, & de-Miguel, 2012a, Guzmán, Pukkala, Palahí, & de-Miguel, 2012bHeiðarsson & Pukkala, 2012). De-Miguel, Guzmán, & Pukkala (2013) found that, in the absence of calibration data, mixed-effects models should be used with caution.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, the variation in our study was from 8.4 m 3 m 3 ha -1 year -1 to 50.1 m 3 ha -1 year -1 . A model based study done on E.globulus in Bolivia by Guzmán et al (2012) also found that the mean annual growth with optimal rotation length is about 13 m 3 ha -1 year -1 on medium quality sites and 18 m 3 ha -1 year -1 one productive sites. However, our results was higher than the Bolivian study although the study did not based on site productivity classification.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…In addition, the synchronization of seedlings in nurseries is highly sensitive to temperature. Therefore, to support agricultural management, a technique that enables reliable prediction of seedling growth is necessary [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%