2014
DOI: 10.1177/1028315314563078
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Model for Stakeholders’ Influence on Internationalization

Abstract: This article aims to discuss stakeholders’ influence on higher education institutions’ (HEIs) internationalization, through an analysis of the relationships established between stakeholders’ importance and the institutions’ rationales for internationalization, the strategies developed for internationalization, and the benefits from internationalization. Data for this study were collected in 80 Portuguese, Dutch, and Brazilian HEIs, using a questionnaire adapted from the 2nd and 3rd International Survey of Inte… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, we answer the call of Parmar et al (2010) to address why universities in similar institutional environments are structured and processed differently on the ranking issue with different outcomes. Second, we complement prior studies that merely identify internal and/or external stakeholders' pressures on university rankings and lack of specifications (e.g., Paradeise and Thoenig, 2013;Castro et al, 2014). Third, many studies have been done to determine stakeholders' pressures, particularly from the government, on increasing worldclass university status in South-East Asia, such as Singapore (Sanders, 2018), Malaysia (Tan and Goh, 2014), Thailand (Rungfamai, 2016), and Vietnam (Nguyen et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Specifically, we answer the call of Parmar et al (2010) to address why universities in similar institutional environments are structured and processed differently on the ranking issue with different outcomes. Second, we complement prior studies that merely identify internal and/or external stakeholders' pressures on university rankings and lack of specifications (e.g., Paradeise and Thoenig, 2013;Castro et al, 2014). Third, many studies have been done to determine stakeholders' pressures, particularly from the government, on increasing worldclass university status in South-East Asia, such as Singapore (Sanders, 2018), Malaysia (Tan and Goh, 2014), Thailand (Rungfamai, 2016), and Vietnam (Nguyen et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Therefore, it is important to understand stakeholders as sources of change in the university to obtain world-class status (Paradeise and Thoenig, 2013). Several studies have investigated stakeholders' roles on this issue, such as the faculties' disappointment on the dropping of their university ranking, forcing administrators to emphasise more on ranking (Ginsberg, 2011); the internationalisation strategies shaped by internal and external stakeholders (Castro et al, 2014); the external stakeholders' roles on universities to become institutions of excellence or, at least, reputable ones (Paradeise and Thoenig, 2013); and that governments make budget allocation based on global rankings (Hazelkorn, 2011). However, what kind of pressures and from which stakeholders (internal or external ones) that lead to the organisational changes to obtain world-class status lack of investigation, which is the purpose of this study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If stakeholders' understanding does not have in common, stakeholders will have different activities which may not lead to a common goal. Therefore, stakeholders must understand internationalization in full to act following pre-determined goals (Castro et al, 2015;Nguyen, 2018).…”
Section: Stakeholders' Understanding Of Internationalizationmentioning
confidence: 99%