“…The goal of this paper is to advance the current MCD literature, which tends to rely heavily on course evaluations and descriptions of implementations substantiated by student satisfaction self-report surveys. Representative qualitative reports of MCD innovations include those at Brigham Young University (Todd et al, 1993), Colorado School of Mines (Miller & Olds, 1994), Behrend College at Penn State University (Ford, Goodrich, & Weissbach, 2004), Howard University (Thigpen, Glakpe, Gomes, & McCloud, 2004), University of Missouri-Rolla (Stone & Hubing, 2002), Harvey Mudd College (Bright & Philips, 1999), and Santa Clara University (Kitts & Quinn, 2004). Reviewing the literature of capstone design courses, Dutson, Todd, Magleby, & Sorensen (1997) state that "the literature is filled with positive comments from students, instructors, and industrial sponsors who have participated in capstone design courses," with most participants reporting that they benefitted from it.…”