1979
DOI: 10.1017/s0003356100023618
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A model for the effects of energy nutrition on the pregnant ewe

Abstract: A computer-based model of the response of the ewe to energy nutrition during pregnancy is described, based on a previous analysis of energy requirements. A ewe of specified weight and body condition 30 days from conception, carrying a known number of lambs, is predicted to grow them to an optimal weight if the nutritional regime allows. Daily energy requirements of the ewe-foetus system are calculated as the sum of requirements for maintenance and for growth and are compared with the daily energy supplied. If … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The individual rations were calculated using the model of Geisler and Neal (1979). The grass pellets provided during pregnancy were from a single batch and had a gross energy concentration of 18-43 MJ/kg DM, with a mean metabolizability of 0-455 measured in vivo using 2-year-old ewes during their 17th week of pregnancy.…”
Section: Management Of Stockmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The individual rations were calculated using the model of Geisler and Neal (1979). The grass pellets provided during pregnancy were from a single batch and had a gross energy concentration of 18-43 MJ/kg DM, with a mean metabolizability of 0-455 measured in vivo using 2-year-old ewes during their 17th week of pregnancy.…”
Section: Management Of Stockmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The modulation of Q Y by priority S is consistent with the more pronounced effect of underfeeding on milk production in early lactation (Broster, 1972) and the favoured diversion of energy surplus into milk, when this option is available, rather than into body reserves (Friggens et al, 2004). As in the model of energy requirements of the pregnant ewe developed by Geisler and Neal (1979), the supply of energy to ensure an optimal foetal growth is seen as a 'protected' function. This formalism implicitly assumes that the flow P* corresponds to an optimal foetal growth.…”
Section: Model Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 52%