1984
DOI: 10.1080/01446198400000015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A model for the selection of the optimum crane for construction sites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furusaka and Gray used the objective function that minimizes rental, installation, and disconnection costs to select an optimal crane, proposing a model that combines various tower cranes (Furusaka and Gray 1984). However, their proposal was not a stability review of mobile cranes.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furusaka and Gray used the objective function that minimizes rental, installation, and disconnection costs to select an optimal crane, proposing a model that combines various tower cranes (Furusaka and Gray 1984). However, their proposal was not a stability review of mobile cranes.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The case study was carried out to verify the effectiveness of the proposed algorithms. Many researchers have conducted a wide range of studies about mobile cranes such as the implementation of a lifting rout plan program (Reddy and Koshy 2002;Lozano-Pérez and Wesley 1979) and a crane selection algorithm (Al-Hussein et al 2001;Shapira and Schexnayder 1999;Al-Hussein et al 1997;Furusaka and Gray 1984;Gray and Little 1985), the overturn analysis of outriggers (Tamate et al 2005), the friction with other works (Tantisevi and Burcu 2007) and even the development of a dual lifting simulation program. However, they didn't deal with a series of mobile crane management for securing both stability and economy, but dealt with the partial issue of it, whereas this paper covered the principal issues from selecting a proper crane responding to the lifting conditions to reviewing the stability of cranes automatically, followed by the economic design of reinforcement plates.…”
Section: Competing Interestsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furusaka and Gray selected optimum tower cranes by using an object function that minimizes rental, installation, and removal costs, proposing a model that combines various crane types. However, their method is difficult to apply to buildings 20 floors or higher that are advantageous in terms of construction period and cost when the same crane is used constantly [1]. Gray and Little [4] proposed a process for selecting mobile cranes and tower cranes that are suitable for the given design at the initial design phase.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, there is a lack of systematic techniques and data for a method that considers both the stability and economic feasibility of the given candidate. Studies of optimum tower crane selection in accordance with project conditions [1][2][3][4] were conducted previously, but an examination of stability was excluded. In addition, Lee et al [5] proposed a method for analysing the economic feasibility of lateral support and Kim et al [6] suggested a cost calculation method that can be applied to foundations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Warszawski (1973) proposed a time distance formula in which quantitative evaluation of location was possible. Furusaka and Gray (1984) presented a dynamic programming model with the objective function being hire cost, but without consideration of location. Gray and Little (1985) optimized crane location in irregular-shaped building while Wijesundera and Harris (1986) designed a simulation model to reconstruct operation times and equipment cycles when handling concrete.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%