2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.06.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A model of pedestrian-induced bridge vibration based on full-scale measurement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the latter test program, a value of 90 psf (4309 Pa), as the maximum allowable pedestrian load, is still used in the AASHTO guideline for footbridge design [12]. In general, the static load per unit area neglects the dynamic effect of the human movement; therefore, serviceability guidelines are not able to predict the structural dynamic response accurately, suffering from inconsistent and sometimes illogical design solutions, and indicating the gap in knowledge in this approach [96], [97], [98].…”
Section: Guidelines and Standardsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the latter test program, a value of 90 psf (4309 Pa), as the maximum allowable pedestrian load, is still used in the AASHTO guideline for footbridge design [12]. In general, the static load per unit area neglects the dynamic effect of the human movement; therefore, serviceability guidelines are not able to predict the structural dynamic response accurately, suffering from inconsistent and sometimes illogical design solutions, and indicating the gap in knowledge in this approach [96], [97], [98].…”
Section: Guidelines and Standardsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After numerous studies, it is found out that the interaction between the pedestrian's and the structure's mechanical systems recursively affect each other. [50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58] In other words, similar to the transition from rigid support models to soil-structure interaction, or from simplified moving vehicle loads to vehicle-structure interaction, conventional pedestrian load models evolved into comprehensive approaches introducing human-structure interaction. In this study, the interaction between the structure and the pedestrian is not explicitly considered, yet few remarks will be presented in section ''Results and discussion'' as the field test results are discussed.…”
Section: Walk-induced Vibrationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, modeling human body and activities plays an important role on defining pedestrian and crowd loads on civil infrastructure, where the human-induced motion and structural response is not independent of each other and should be examined together to involve human-structure interaction. [50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58] For these reasons, it might be beneficial to avoid generalized models and instead collect customized sensor data in order to build pedestrian's biomechanical features. For example, studies have shown the possibility of using sensor data to identify posture and activity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, these typically exhibit several natural frequencies below 5 Hz, with several in the range of pedestrian-walking frequencies (around 2 Hz vertical and 1 Hz lateral) [27], which tend to be closely spaced. Their rich dynamics have been the subject of extensive research [28][29][30][31][32].…”
Section: A Case Study On Pedestrian Bridgementioning
confidence: 99%