2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-13009-1_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Model of Public Choice with Clientelism and Corruption: Introducing the Analytical

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We first present the game of electoral competition with clientelism and then introduce the period of government as a model of public expenditure with corruption. Our model is similar to the regionalized and syntactic presentation of Cendales et al (2019), although ours has a national scope and it is explicitly solved. In addition, we are empirically testing the model using DiD regression.…”
Section: A Simple Model Of Subnational Public Choice With Clientelism...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We first present the game of electoral competition with clientelism and then introduce the period of government as a model of public expenditure with corruption. Our model is similar to the regionalized and syntactic presentation of Cendales et al (2019), although ours has a national scope and it is explicitly solved. In addition, we are empirically testing the model using DiD regression.…”
Section: A Simple Model Of Subnational Public Choice With Clientelism...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The median voter is a low-income citizen living in a “Crisis of Democratic Representation”, with a low marginal valuation of their vote, and who easily sell it to local political brokers (Nieva, 2019; Robinson, 2016; Eaton and Chambers, 2014; Eaton, 2006; Eduardo and Muñloz, 2011; Acemoglu and Robinson, 2012). Our theoretical model is in this sense similar to the regionalized presentation of Cendales et al (2019), although ours has a national scope and it is explicitly solved. In addition, we are performing the corresponding empirical test.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%