1977
DOI: 10.1016/0022-5193(77)90015-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A model of social grooming among adult female monkeys

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

31
433
10
13

Year Published

1996
1996
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 638 publications
(487 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
31
433
10
13
Order By: Relevance
“…Judge concluded that the findings supported the VRH under the assumption that the extent of shared interests, hence relationship value, varies inversely with rank distance. However, rather than test the assumption, he merely cited Seyfarth's (1977) statement that closely ranked baboons tend to have strong social bonds. Castles and Whiten conceded that rank distance was an indirect measure of relationship quality and refrained from making strong statements about the VRH.…”
Section: Testing the Vrhmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Judge concluded that the findings supported the VRH under the assumption that the extent of shared interests, hence relationship value, varies inversely with rank distance. However, rather than test the assumption, he merely cited Seyfarth's (1977) statement that closely ranked baboons tend to have strong social bonds. Castles and Whiten conceded that rank distance was an indirect measure of relationship quality and refrained from making strong statements about the VRH.…”
Section: Testing the Vrhmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of studies on the link between social structure, grooming and group size (Kudo and Dunbar, 2001, Lehman et al, 2009) followed standard practices in social network analyses and used a criterion for distinguishing casual from meaningful relation ships. Modeling permits, without using this arbitrary criterion for preferred relationships, the simulation of interactions between group members (Seyfarth, 1977;Bryson et al, 2007;Meunier et al, 2006;Sellers et al, 2007;Puga Gonzalez et al, 2009) and also resulting sub grouping patterns (i.e. how individuals are sub grouped; Ramos Fernandez et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Food is the limiting resource in nature that would lead to the establishment of a dominance hierarchy. However, in an established hierarchical system, access to dominant females to solicit agonistic support itself becomes a limiting resource, and the subordinate females try to achieve this by grooming dominants (Seyfarth 1977). In macaques, grooming therefore is upward in the hierarchy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%