2007
DOI: 10.1007/bf02832354
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A model-order reduction method based on Krylov subspaces for mimo bilinear dynamical systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
26
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that only SISO systems are considered in [16,159]. For MIMO systems, the expression of the transfer function will be different, see [84,137]. In [137], a method similar to [159] was extended to MIMO systems.…”
Section: Multimoment-matching Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that only SISO systems are considered in [16,159]. For MIMO systems, the expression of the transfer function will be different, see [84,137]. In [137], a method similar to [159] was extended to MIMO systems.…”
Section: Multimoment-matching Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the following we consider several medium-sized numerical examples and compare the approximation property of balanced truncation with that of a Krylov subspace projection method, developed in [4], which we briefly summarize below. (Other Krylov subspace methods for bilinear systems can be found, e.g., in [47,38,21,12,8].) Since it is not obvious to define a transfer norm for nonlinear systems, we compare just the outputs of the original system and the reduced systems for a given input function.…”
Section: Covariance Approximationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We do so by means of a multiscale analysis of the balanced equations of motion which are shown to collapse to a dimension reduced system when some of the Hankel singular values go to zero; see, e.g., [35,36] for a related approach or [22,47,59,29] in which low-rank perturbative approximations of transfer functions of linear systems are sought. To the best of our knowledge our approach is new, and, although it is based on computing an appropriate balanced form of the system equations which certainly becomes infeasible if the system is extremely high-dimensional (n ∼ 10 6 or larger), we see it not merely as an alternative, but rather as an extension to existing projectionbased methods such as Krylov subspace [54,4,15,45,46,12,10] or interpolation (moment-matching) methods [9,23,67], and empirical POD [37,44,13,58]; see also [7,60]. A common feature of these methods is that they identify a subspace which contains the "essential" part of the dynamics, and we suggest to combine the numerically cheap identification of Krylov or POD subspaces with singular perturbation methods that have certain advantages in terms of structure preservation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%