1995
DOI: 10.1145/201977.201989
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A modern, agent-oriented approach to introductory artificial intelligence

Abstract: We describe our experiences in teaching introductory AI and in writing a textbook for the course. The book tries to make the concepts of AI more concrete via two strategies: relating them to the student's existing knowledge, and using examples based on an agent operating in an environment. Perceived Problems with Current AI TextsIn the dozen or so times we have taught introductory AI, we have used several of the existing texts, and have always had complaints from students. In a recent student evaluation survey… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
943
0
54

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,327 publications
(1,945 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
943
0
54
Order By: Relevance
“…As an example, if t = person, then crossing a street is not independent of standing still, but both are approximately independent of sex, {male, female}, and of child vs. adult, as well as whether o t is carrying something or wearing a hat. These conditional independence assumptions decrease the size of the set A in [3], thereby increasing the set of o ∈ O T used to estimate P H ðX q = 1Þ.…”
Section: Statistical Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As an example, if t = person, then crossing a street is not independent of standing still, but both are approximately independent of sex, {male, female}, and of child vs. adult, as well as whether o t is carrying something or wearing a hat. These conditional independence assumptions decrease the size of the set A in [3], thereby increasing the set of o ∈ O T used to estimate P H ðX q = 1Þ.…”
Section: Statistical Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alan Turing (1) proposed that the ultimate test of whether a machine could "think," or think at least as well as a person, was for a human judge to be unable to tell which was which based on natural language conversations in an appropriately cloaked scenario. In a much-discussed variation (sometimes called the "standard interpretation"), the objective is to measure how well a computer can imitate a human (2) in some circumscribed task normally associated with intelligent behavior, although the practical utility of "imitation" as a criterion for performance has also been questioned (3). In fact, the overwhelming focus of the modern artificial intelligence (AI) community has been to assess machine performance more directly by dedicated tests for specific tasks rather than debating about general "thinking" or Turing-like competitions between people and machines.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We note that the combined probability of having no errors or only one error is more than 92 %. We compared the Q-SELECT algorithm results with those obtained by a C4.5 decision tree [19,20]. Table 4 shows the comparable error rates of both methods for the highest number of questions eliminated by the Q-SELECT algorithm.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, through an BN it is possible to obtain any information relating to any variable in the network [Pearl 2014]. According to [Russell et al 1995] BNs are a compact way of representing the joint probability distribution of a set of variables.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to [Russell et al 1995], inference it is a distribution mechanism for calculating a posteriori probability for a set of variables, given a set of evidence, namely random variables with values instantiated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%