1997
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4899-2837-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Modern Approach to Probability Theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
215
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 286 publications
(216 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
215
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In words, this means that the distribution of X k becomes close to that of X when k is large. For more on this, other equivalent definitions, and extensive coverage of convergence in distribution, see Billingsley (1968), Fristedt and Gray (1997), or other probability texts. As mentioned in the Introduction, our results follow from the assumption that the vector of the normalized number of arrivals converges in distribution to the vector of the original expected number of arrivals:…”
Section: Asymptotic Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In words, this means that the distribution of X k becomes close to that of X when k is large. For more on this, other equivalent definitions, and extensive coverage of convergence in distribution, see Billingsley (1968), Fristedt and Gray (1997), or other probability texts. As mentioned in the Introduction, our results follow from the assumption that the vector of the normalized number of arrivals converges in distribution to the vector of the original expected number of arrivals:…”
Section: Asymptotic Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…X closed, be a Polish subspace, i.e., X is separable (it has a countable dense subset) and complete (every Cauchy sequence in X converges to a point x ∈ X) [11,12]. We denote as AC(X) the collection of all probability measures µ on (X, B(X)) which are absolutely continuous with respect to (w.r.t.)…”
Section: Definitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is known (see [16,17,20,26,33]) that convergence P n → P in the Prohorov metric is equivalent to the statement…”
Section: Theoretical Framework For General Delay Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%