2007
DOI: 10.14490/jjss.37.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Modified Box-Cox Transformation in the Multivariate ARMA Model

Abstract: The Box-Cox transformation has been used as a simple method of transforming dependent variable in ordinary-linear regression circumstances for improving the Gaussian-likelihood fit and making the disturbance terms of a model reasonably homoscedastic. The paper introduces a new version of the Box-Cox transformation and investigates how it works in terms of asymptotic performance and application, focusing in particular on inference on stationary multivariate ARMA models. The paper proposes a computational estima… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The problem of establishing the asymptotic properties of the MLEs in our setting is a difficult one. It is similar to, but appears to be more technically challenging than, the problem of showing consistency and efficiency of MLEs for a Box-Cox-transformed Gaussian ARMA process, as discussed in Terasaka and Hosoya (2007). We are also working with a componentwise transformed ARMA process, although, in our case, the transformation (X t ) → (Z t ) is via the nonlinear, non-increasing volatility proxy transformation T (Z) (x) in ( 5), which is not differentiable at the change point µ T .…”
Section: Statistical Inferencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The problem of establishing the asymptotic properties of the MLEs in our setting is a difficult one. It is similar to, but appears to be more technically challenging than, the problem of showing consistency and efficiency of MLEs for a Box-Cox-transformed Gaussian ARMA process, as discussed in Terasaka and Hosoya (2007). We are also working with a componentwise transformed ARMA process, although, in our case, the transformation (X t ) → (Z t ) is via the nonlinear, non-increasing volatility proxy transformation T (Z) (x) in ( 5), which is not differentiable at the change point µ T .…”
Section: Statistical Inferencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The initial assumption of BCT restricted to positive data. Additionally, BCT restricts the sample space of the transformed variable by the two inequalities Z λ > −1\λ if λ > 0 and Z λ > −1\λ if λ < 0 so that it is not consistent with the normality assumption of the transformed variable [13]. Yeo and Johnson [14] generalized the BCT within the case of the negative random variable to achieve the advantage of working without having to fret about the domain of Z.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the classic paper by Box and Cox , Gurka et al . examined Box–Cox transformations in linear mixed models, and Terasaka and Hosoya extended the Box–Cox transformation to the multivariate time series model. Bayesian papers include that of Pericchi and Sweeting who examined the choice of prior distribution for the Box–Cox transformed linear model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%