1990
DOI: 10.1016/0045-7949(90)90173-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A modified finite element-transfer matrix for control design of space structures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By following the model reduction process presented in Section 3 for each control input, we obtain two reduced-order models as shown in (37), and their mathematical descriptions would depend on where the control inputs are applied. For comparisons, we consider only four pairs of mass locations: (8,9), (7,10), (3,15), and (5,13). Table II shows the comparisons of the total system energy for the four pairs of input locations while subjected to similar levels of control input energy.…”
Section: Numerical Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By following the model reduction process presented in Section 3 for each control input, we obtain two reduced-order models as shown in (37), and their mathematical descriptions would depend on where the control inputs are applied. For comparisons, we consider only four pairs of mass locations: (8,9), (7,10), (3,15), and (5,13). Table II shows the comparisons of the total system energy for the four pairs of input locations while subjected to similar levels of control input energy.…”
Section: Numerical Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We now have the capability of adding in external forces and quantifying some of contributions of a state to its self, to continue the left to right propagation the next set of states to the left must be related to the node. Equation 12 shows the means of propagating the previous states contributions to the left vector.…”
Section: Left To Rightmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The damping incorporates extremely low internal damping of the carbon fiber and the friction due to the reversible attachment of the parts. The basic concept behind this approach was inspired by the work of Tan et al [12], where the notion of modified transfer matrix method (M-TMM) approach was developed by utilizing the dynamic stiffness matrix of finite element. The primary goal there was to reduce the computational efforts involved in structural analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The FE-TM approach was then applied for chain-like structure analysis [9] and closed-loop kinematic chain of flexible structures like the four-bar mechanism [10]. A modified version of FE-TM allowed researchers to extend the method to Space structures for control purposes: Tan et al [11] proposed the collocated control of a beam by Linear Quadratic Regulator (LQR) theory. Rui et al [12] provided the dynamic model of a multiple launch rocket system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are mainly two limitations in FE-TM formulation: the first one comes from the derivation of the transfer-matrix which requires the inversion of the sub-matrices associated with each element [11], that is possible if and only if these sub-matrices are non-singular and square; the second one consists in the difficulty to model non tree-like multibody structures with both multiple input and multi output ends [15]. The latter limitation is an important issue in the Space field, where complex and different flexible appendages such as solar arrays, antennas or robotic arms are attached to the spacecraft's central body.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%