2016
DOI: 10.1007/s00167-016-4151-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A modified technique to reduce tibial keel cutting errors during an Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

Abstract: Retrospective comparative study, Level III.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We think there are several other reasons, including our technical error of cutting the surface, and implanting the components. 38 A navigation system or robotic surgery might be necessary for accurate implantation and excellent results, even though previous studies have not yet reported on the superiority of this technology. 39,40 With regard to the relationship between flexion angle and clinical outcomes, the items which influenced most on the difference of the outcomes of KOOS subscales between group 1 and group 3 was as follows: (symptom) S5.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We think there are several other reasons, including our technical error of cutting the surface, and implanting the components. 38 A navigation system or robotic surgery might be necessary for accurate implantation and excellent results, even though previous studies have not yet reported on the superiority of this technology. 39,40 With regard to the relationship between flexion angle and clinical outcomes, the items which influenced most on the difference of the outcomes of KOOS subscales between group 1 and group 3 was as follows: (symptom) S5.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Femoral drilling was performed with an Oxford Microplasty device (MP: Biomet Ltd., Swindon, UK) to facilitate reproducible implantation [18]. After these procedures, we performed the same gap‐balancing procedure between knee flexion and extension and a modified keel cutting method as previously reported [5]. With the trial component and bearing in place, the knee was manipulated through a full range of motion (ROM) to demonstrate joint stability, the security of the mobile bearing and absence of impingement.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Femoral drilling was performed using an Oxford Microplasty device (MP: Biomet Ltd., Swindon, UK) to facilitate reproducible implantation 18 . Following these procedures, we performed a gap balancing procedure between knee flexion and extension and a modified keel cutting method as previously reported 31 . With the trial component and bearing in place, the knee was manipulated through a full range-of-motion (ROM) to demonstrate joint stability, security of the mobile-bearing joint, and absence of impingement.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%