OCEANS 2018 MTS/IEEE Charleston 2018
DOI: 10.1109/oceans.2018.8604819
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Modular Sensor Suite for Underwater Reconstruction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, it is compared to other state-of-the-art methods, i.e., VINS-Mono [10], the basic OKVIS [9], and the MSCKF [11] implementation from the GRASP lab [40]. Second, we qualitatively test the proposed approach on several different datasets collected utilizing a custom made sensor suite [16] and an Aqua2 AUV [17].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Moreover, it is compared to other state-of-the-art methods, i.e., VINS-Mono [10], the basic OKVIS [9], and the MSCKF [11] implementation from the GRASP lab [40]. Second, we qualitatively test the proposed approach on several different datasets collected utilizing a custom made sensor suite [16] and an Aqua2 AUV [17].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…( 3), is taken only with the matched landmarks with loop candidate for calculating the sonar error term and reprojection error; see Eq. (16).…”
Section: Loop-closing and Relocalizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Dataset description. The experimental data were collected using a custom-made sensor suite (Rahman et al, 2018a) (see Figure 3) and an Aqua2 robot (Dudek et al, 2005). Both are equipped with a stereo camera, an IMU, and a pressure sensor.…”
Section: Validation On Underwater Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%