2019 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/iros40897.2019.8967703
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SVIn2: An Underwater SLAM System using Sonar, Visual, Inertial, and Depth Sensor

Abstract: This paper presents a novel tightly-coupled keyframe-based Simultaneous Localization and Mapping (SLAM) system with loop-closing and relocalization capabilities targeted for the underwater domain.Our previous work, SVIn, augmented the state-of-the-art visual-inertial state estimation package OKVIS to accommodate acoustic data from sonar in a non-linear optimization-based framework. This paper addresses drift and loss of localization -one of the main problems affecting other packages in underwater domain -by pr… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ORB-SLAM2 method has been implemented for navigating AUVs in [53], and for mapping an underwater cave in [54]. The VINS-Mono and OKVIS algorithms, integrating inertial sensors, have been used to track the pose of a camera in an underwater environment [33] [34].…”
Section: B Comparisons Between Ivo and Other Visual Navigation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The ORB-SLAM2 method has been implemented for navigating AUVs in [53], and for mapping an underwater cave in [54]. The VINS-Mono and OKVIS algorithms, integrating inertial sensors, have been used to track the pose of a camera in an underwater environment [33] [34].…”
Section: B Comparisons Between Ivo and Other Visual Navigation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of that, camera pose estimation and mapping of underwater structures are processed simultaneously by minimizing the cost function. Sharmin improved the method by applying a robust initialization method, an image enhanced technique, and a loop-closure technique in[34]. However, these methods were not tested by quantitative evaluation methods in the underwater environment.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, a large focus has been put in the robotic field on terrestrial and aerial applications based on camera sensors [7,8]. Some efforts were also made to use optical sensors for underwater applications [9][10][11], but were rather limited as they were highly dependent on water conditions (turbidity, luminosity). Hence we cannot guarantee the robot localization in an unknown environment based solely on vision sensors.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They used an array of 54 pencil-beam sonars placed around their vehicle in order to map the environment and recognize previously mapped region for SLAM purposes. Rahman et al [10] proposed a system for underwater cave exploration. They notably leverage profiling sonar, and inertial and depth sensors to strengthen their approach based on stereo camera vision.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Machine vision processing technology mainly employs cameras and computers to analyze images and provide control information of the AUV drive system. There have been numerous research studies on the application of an AUV equipped with machine vision processing technology, such as the detection of underwater man-made structures and pipeline detection [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10], auxiliary sonar image navigation [11,12], simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM) [13][14][15][16][17], obstacle avoidance [18,19], identifying and tracking the habitats of sea animals [20], underwater docking systems [21][22][23][24][25][26][27], and object tracking [28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%