1964
DOI: 10.1126/science.144.3621.959
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Molecular Approach in the Systematics of Higher Organisms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
59
2
1

Year Published

1966
1966
1976
1976

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 174 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
59
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Whether these organisms deserve separate species recognition is more a matter of opinion than of fact. For nomenclatural purposes it should be recalled that other organisms which differ by some 25 yo of their genome, such as rhesus monkey and man (Hoyer, McCarthy & Bolton, 1964), may differ by as many as 8 x lo5 cistrons ('total' mol. weight of mammalian DNA 2 x 10l2 and assuming It is seen that strain M 2 and c 1 4 are aberrant from the main group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whether these organisms deserve separate species recognition is more a matter of opinion than of fact. For nomenclatural purposes it should be recalled that other organisms which differ by some 25 yo of their genome, such as rhesus monkey and man (Hoyer, McCarthy & Bolton, 1964), may differ by as many as 8 x lo5 cistrons ('total' mol. weight of mammalian DNA 2 x 10l2 and assuming It is seen that strain M 2 and c 1 4 are aberrant from the main group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Filters with immobilized DNA were preincubated in the medium of Denhardt (I 966) for 2 to 6 h. at the temperature to be used for hybridization, drained and blotted, and then placed in vials which contained I pg, homologous or heterologous labelled DNA fragments in twofold concentrated SSC. For competition experiments (Hoyer, McCarthy & Bolton, 1964), a large excess of unlabelled DNA fragments was added to the reaction mixture (final volume of 0.5 ml.) to compete with labelled DNA fragments for binding sites on the immobilized DNA.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Percentage of DNA relatedness Direct hybridization is not the best method for the determination of the percentage DNA relatedness (Hoyer, McCarthy & Bolton, 1964), and it was not our explicit purpose to measure it. The calculation of a high or moderate percentage DNA relatedness between individual strains relative to a reference strain is not meaningful in direct hybridization because of the high standard deviation of about 20%.…”
Section: Stability Of Molecular Hybrids Formed At 42 "Cmentioning
confidence: 99%