2017
DOI: 10.13182/fst16-121
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Molecular Dynamics Study of Subsurface Hydrogen-Helium Bubbles in Tungsten

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
5
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For annealing above the He irradiation temperature, small He bubbles diffuse and disappear in the first few nanometer layer below the surface leaving a pristine W decorated with larger He bubbles where D can diffuse and bind to the bubbles periphery, thus increasing the D retention. Indeed, DFT and MD studies [25,26,27] have shown that deuterium atoms bind around He-vacancy clusters complexes and ∼2 nm He bubbles with a large binding energy range of 0.8-2.0 eV consistent with our broad D desorption peak. Our interpretation is also consistent with the following observation: a higher He release for the LF sample but a higher D retention for the HF sample.…”
Section: Thermodesorption Analysissupporting
confidence: 83%
“…For annealing above the He irradiation temperature, small He bubbles diffuse and disappear in the first few nanometer layer below the surface leaving a pristine W decorated with larger He bubbles where D can diffuse and bind to the bubbles periphery, thus increasing the D retention. Indeed, DFT and MD studies [25,26,27] have shown that deuterium atoms bind around He-vacancy clusters complexes and ∼2 nm He bubbles with a large binding energy range of 0.8-2.0 eV consistent with our broad D desorption peak. Our interpretation is also consistent with the following observation: a higher He release for the LF sample but a higher D retention for the HF sample.…”
Section: Thermodesorption Analysissupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Recent modelling effort has looked at the influence of H on the formation of He bubbles, where experimental data has so far proved inconclusive (although it generally suggests that H plays a role) [360] . Atomistic simulations (MD and ab-initio) appear to be consistent with the idea that H is trapped within He bubbles [329][330][331] . Helium is strongly trapped at grain boundaries and can dramatically change material performance.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…As well, there are numerous indications that atomic H that is trapped at the interface of high pressure He bubbles, as was identified in work on He implanted bcc Fe by Meyers and co-workers [327] and in the nickel base alloy X-750 irradiated in CANDU reactors with very large He production by Judge and coworkers [328] . The experimental assessments indicating the segregation and trapping of atomic H at high pressure He bubbles is consistent with atomic-scale modelling using MD [329] and DFT calculations in both bcc Fe [330] and W [331] . The modelling predicts that the segregation and trapping of atomic H to the interface of noble gas bubbles is relatively insensitive to gas densities of over-pressurized bubbles.…”
Section: Bubble Formationsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Density functional theory (DFT) calculations show strong attraction between He and HIs [9,15], indicating preferential trapping of H around He clusters. Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations show that a large amount of H can be accommodated around He bubbles [16,10,17]. Increased D retention was observed experimentally in a recent study after thermal cycling of He irradiated W samples where visible bubbles were observed [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%